This page describes pharmacological agents that may have legal restrictions, side effects, and drug interactions in your jurisdiction. Information is for educational research only — consult a clinician before considering any compound.
BAM-15
Surface here is educational only; do not use without medical supervision. Our editorial verdict is SKIP-FOR-NOW — current cost / risk / redundancy puts it below the line.
Our depth — beyond the mirror
Deeper analysis, verdict reasoning, and per-archetype recommendations from our research team.
▸ Editor's verdict SKIP-FOR-NOW HIGH
"The mechanism class (mitochondrial protonophores / DNP-class uncouplers) has killed dozens of confirmed users via hyperthermia — DNP fatalities continue today in the bodybuilding underground. BAM-15 is a credible attempt to engineer that risk away by sparing the plasma-membrane potential, and the rodent data (Kenwood 2014, Alexopoulos 2020, Childress 2018) is genuinely encouraging — fat loss, NAFLD reversal, insulin sensitization without observable hyperthermia at therapeutic doses. **But: zero published human Phase 1, zero published human PK, zero registered human trials, no IND on public record, no published clinical safety data of any kind as of May 2026.** For a 20yo lean MMA athlete + business owner whose actual goal is performance and longevity (not weight loss), there is **no plausible benefit** that justifies being a guinea pig for a research-chem version of an uncoupler class with a body count. **Cleaner alternatives exist for every plausible use case:** for fat loss → semaglutide, tirzepatide, retatrutide (all FDA-approved with massive safety datasets); for metabolic health → exercise, sleep, V4 stack already running; for mitochondrial function → urolithin A (OTC, safe), training. **SKIP-FOR-NOW until a human Phase 1 reads out clean.** What would change this verdict: (a) a published human Phase 1 with full safety + PK data, (b) FDA IND filing or trial registration on ClinicalTrials.gov, (c) published chronic rodent oncology + cardiac safety data at therapeutic doses, (d) a clinical reason for fat loss in this user (he is a 20yo lean athlete — there is currently no such reason)."
▸ Decision matrix by user profile Per-archetype
| Archetype | Verdict | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
★20-30, brain-priority, high cognitive workload + combat athlete (this user) | SKIP-FOR-NOW | HIGH confidence. No fat-loss goal, no body-composition complaint, mechanism actively reduces ATP yield (working against athletic output), heat-stress training environment compounds risk, cleaner FDA-approved alternatives exist for any future weight-loss scenario. No plausible benefit profile. |
30-50, executive maintenance, sedentary or detraining, mild metabolic decline | SKIP-FOR-NOW | HIGH confidence. Slightly more headroom in the use case (mild fat-loss goal possible), but FDA-approved GLP-1 agonists are vastly better-characterized and produce equivalent or larger fat loss. No clinical scenario where BAM-15 is preferred. |
50+, longevity-focused, metabolic syndrome | SKIP-FOR-NOW | HIGH confidence. Same logic as 30-50, plus higher baseline cardiac risk, higher baseline cancer risk, higher baseline hepatic vulnerability. The exact demographic where unvalidated mitochondrial-pathway agents are most concerning. |
Anxiety-prone | SKIP-PERMANENT | Wrong indication (no anxiolytic mechanism); thermogenic load + sympathetic activation + heat sensation can mimic or amplify panic presentations. |
High athletic load, tested status (WADA-relevant) | SKIP-PERMANENT | Not currently named on Prohibited List, but mechanism plausibly under S4.4 Metabolic Modulators catch-all. Risk of in-competition detection or assay-development banning is real. |
Sleep-disordered | SKIP-PERMANENT | Wrong indication; thermogenic mechanism actively disrupts sleep, especially with later-day dosing. |
Recovery-focused (post-injury, post-illness) | SKIP-PERMANENT | Wrong indication; mechanism reduces ATP yield, slowing tissue repair processes that depend on mitochondrial output. |
Strength/anabolic-focused | SKIP-PERMANENT | Wrong direction — uncoupling reduces ATP availability for high-power efforts and is mechanistically opposed to anabolic / hypertrophy stimulus. |
Active fat-loss goal in metabolically compromised user | SKIP-FOR-NOW | (until human Phase 1). Even in the demographic where BAM-15's mouse benefit profile maps to a real clinical need, FDA-approved GLP-1 agonists (semaglutide, tirzepatide, retatrutide) have massive safety datasets and equivalent or superior efficacy. There is no clinical scenario where a research-chem uncoupler is preferred to a validated GLP-1 today. |
History of cardiac event, stroke, liver disease, hyperthyroidism | SKIP-PERMANENT | Hard contraindication. |
Pregnant / breastfeeding | SKIP-PERMANENT | Hard contraindication. |
- ★20-30, brain-priority, high cognitive workload + combat athlete (this user)SKIP-FOR-NOW
HIGH confidence. No fat-loss goal, no body-composition complaint, mechanism actively reduces ATP yield (working against athletic output), heat-stress training environment compounds risk, cleaner FDA-approved alternatives exist for any future weight-loss scenario. No plausible benefit profile.
- 30-50, executive maintenance, sedentary or detraining, mild metabolic declineSKIP-FOR-NOW
HIGH confidence. Slightly more headroom in the use case (mild fat-loss goal possible), but FDA-approved GLP-1 agonists are vastly better-characterized and produce equivalent or larger fat loss. No clinical scenario where BAM-15 is preferred.
- 50+, longevity-focused, metabolic syndromeSKIP-FOR-NOW
HIGH confidence. Same logic as 30-50, plus higher baseline cardiac risk, higher baseline cancer risk, higher baseline hepatic vulnerability. The exact demographic where unvalidated mitochondrial-pathway agents are most concerning.
- Anxiety-proneSKIP-PERMANENT
Wrong indication (no anxiolytic mechanism); thermogenic load + sympathetic activation + heat sensation can mimic or amplify panic presentations.
- High athletic load, tested status (WADA-relevant)SKIP-PERMANENT
Not currently named on Prohibited List, but mechanism plausibly under S4.4 Metabolic Modulators catch-all. Risk of in-competition detection or assay-development banning is real.
- Sleep-disorderedSKIP-PERMANENT
Wrong indication; thermogenic mechanism actively disrupts sleep, especially with later-day dosing.
- Recovery-focused (post-injury, post-illness)SKIP-PERMANENT
Wrong indication; mechanism reduces ATP yield, slowing tissue repair processes that depend on mitochondrial output.
- Strength/anabolic-focusedSKIP-PERMANENT
Wrong direction — uncoupling reduces ATP availability for high-power efforts and is mechanistically opposed to anabolic / hypertrophy stimulus.
- Active fat-loss goal in metabolically compromised userSKIP-FOR-NOW
(until human Phase 1). Even in the demographic where BAM-15's mouse benefit profile maps to a real clinical need, FDA-approved GLP-1 agonists (semaglutide, tirzepatide, retatrutide) have massive safety datasets and equivalent or superior efficacy. There is no clinical scenario where a research-chem uncoupler is preferred to a validated GLP-1 today.
- History of cardiac event, stroke, liver disease, hyperthyroidismSKIP-PERMANENT
Hard contraindication.
- Pregnant / breastfeedingSKIP-PERMANENT
Hard contraindication.
▸ Subjective experience (deep)
Caveat: subjective reports are extremely scarce, the molecule has been on the gray market for under three years, vendor purity is highly variable, and there is no PK basis for any community dose. What follows is a summary of the small public anecdotal pool with heavy caveats.
- First doses: Most reports describe a subtle but detectable rise in perceived warmth within hours to a day of starting. Not a "stim feel" — more like "the room is warmer than it should be" or "I'm sweating during normal activity." Resting heart rate may tick up 5-15 bpm.
- Week 1-2: Adaptation period. Most users report habituation to the warmth signal but a persistent low-grade thermogenic effect. Some report mild fatigue or reduced workout output — consistent with reduced ATP yield per substrate, especially in glycolytic / high-power efforts. Cardio at fixed pace may feel hotter than usual.
- Week 2-6: Subjective fat loss in users running a caloric deficit; modest in users at maintenance. Mechanism predicts the body burns more substrate per unit of work, so a user at maintenance intake should see a modest deficit emerge passively. Sleep may be disrupted, especially with later-day doses.
- Cycle off: Effects fade over days to a few weeks. No reports of withdrawal or rebound. Body composition changes appear to partially reverse if intake returns to surplus.
- Concerning patterns: Reports exist of users discontinuing due to palpitations, marked heat intolerance, or unexplained fatigue. These are the same patterns that historically preceded DNP fatalities — though none of the BAM-15 anecdotal pool has reported a fatality, the sample size is too small to draw confidence from.
Honesty about variability and signal interpretation: BAM-15 is not a stim. The headline subjective effect is feeling warmer than usual. Anyone who reports a strong "stim feel" is almost certainly running an impure batch, a stimulant-contaminated batch, or experiencing placebo. Reports of dramatic week-1 fat loss are almost certainly water shifts (uncouplers can affect fluid balance) or attribution noise from concurrent caloric restriction.
▸ Tolerance + cycling deep dive
- Tolerance buildup: Unknown. Theoretical possibility that compensatory mitochondrial biogenesis offsets uncoupling over time (the body literally builds more mitochondria to compensate for the leak). Some rodent data suggests mild adaptive responses; no human data.
- Recommended cycle (if used at all): 4-6 weeks on, 8-12 weeks off. ≤2 cycles per year given thermogenic load and unknown chronic profile.
- Reset protocol: No specific reset needed. Half-life in rodents is on the order of hours; subjective effects fade over days to weeks post-cessation.
- Long-term cumulative use (years): Strongly cautioned against until human Phase 1 + chronic rodent oncology / cardiac / hepatic data exists. The DNP precedent is a long-term-safety cautionary tale even when acute dosing is sub-fatal.
▸ Stacking deep dive
Synergistic with
- None recommended. No stack synergy is currently mechanistically justified for BAM-15 in humans. The compound itself has no human safety data; building stacks on top of it compounds uncertainty.
Avoid stacking with
- DNP — additive uncoupling, additive lethal hyperthermia risk. Hard avoid.
- Cardarine (GW-501516) — both push fat oxidation hard; theoretical additive hepatic and metabolic load; Cardarine has its own carcinogenicity concerns. Hard avoid.
- SLU-PP-332 — both target the mitochondrial substrate-oxidation axis from different angles; no human safety data on either; functional opposition (SLU-PP-332 builds mitochondrial capacity, BAM-15 wastes its output as heat).
- MOTS-c — same logic as SLU-PP-332; mitochondrial-pathway-pushing compounds should not be stacked with an uncoupler.
- Semaglutide / tirzepatide / retatrutide — these are the FDA-approved, evidence-based answer to the same goal. No basis to add an unvalidated uncoupler to a working GLP-1 protocol.
- Stimulants (caffeine high-dose, modafinil, ephedrine, clenbuterol, yohimbine) — stimulants raise metabolic rate and core temp on their own; layering on an uncoupler reproduces the DNP fatality envelope.
- Thyroid hormone (T3/T4) — additive thermogenic and cardiac load; do not combine.
- Pre-workout supplements with high stimulant content — same logic; mechanistic risk amplification.
Neutral / safe co-administration
- All V4 daily core supplements (DHA, magnesium, citicoline, NAC, PS, curcumin, rhodiola, theanine, glycine/L-tryptophan, D3/K2, beta-alanine, vitamin C) — no documented mechanistic conflict, but adding noise to attribution during an experimental cycle.
- BPC-157, TB-500 — different mechanism (tissue repair), no documented overlap.
▸ Drug interactions deep dive
- CYP enzymes: BAM-15 metabolic profile in humans is uncharacterized. Conservative assumption: avoid combining with strong CYP inducers/inhibitors during a cycle.
- Hormonal contraceptives: No documented interaction (not relevant for the user). Theoretical: hepatic metabolism shifts could affect contraceptive metabolism.
- Anticoagulants: No documented interaction.
- Alcohol: Acutely impairs hepatic mitochondrial function; combined with BAM-15 (which is increasing hepatic substrate flux and mild thermogenic load) is poor pairing. The user is alcohol-free, so non-issue in practice.
- Caffeine: Mechanistic concern — both raise metabolic rate; theoretical additive thermogenic and cardiac load. The user is on a low-caffeine baseline; do not introduce a higher caffeine load during any cycle.
- Stimulant medications (Adderall, modafinil): Avoid. Mechanism stack reproduces the DNP fatality envelope.
- Statins: Statins can affect mitochondrial function in muscle. Combining with an uncoupler is mechanistically opposing; clinical effect unknown. Not relevant for the user.
- Other peptides (BPC-157, TB-500): No documented interactions; mechanism layers non-overlapping.
▸ Pharmacogenomics
- No BAM-15-specific pharmacogenomic data exists. The molecule has not been administered to humans in any genotyped cohort.
- Indirect candidate gene relevance (theoretical):
- UCP1, UCP2, UCP3 variants — endogenous uncoupling protein variants modulate basal thermogenic capacity. Theoretical modulators of BAM-15 response and heat-stress tolerance. No clinical data.
- CYP enzyme variants — relevant if metabolic clearance pathway becomes characterized.
- PPARGC1A (PGC-1α) Gly482Ser (rs8192678) — affects mitochondrial biogenesis response. Theoretical modulator of compensatory adaptation to chronic uncoupling.
Action item if the user ever overrides verdict (not recommended): Pull UCP1/UCP2/UCP3 status from 23andMe (results June 2026) — speculative but the only available genomic data point.
▸ Sourcing deep dive
| Path | Vendor | Cost | Reliability | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research-chem (gray-market, US-domestic) | Limitless Life Nootropics | ~$60-120 / 1g powder or solution | medium | Catalog includes BAM-15 as of 2024-2025. Demand current COA on lot. |
| Research-chem | Behemoth Labz | ~$50-100 / 1g | medium | Active community vendor for uncoupler-class compounds. Mixed lot consistency. COA on request. |
| Research-chem | Amino Asylum / smaller vendors | varies | low-medium | Vendor proliferation outpaces quality control in this category. Default to verified-COA vendors only. |
| Compounding pharmacy | Not available. | n/a | n/a | BAM-15 is not on FDA's approved compounding substances list and is not available through legitimate compounding pharmacies as of May 2026. |
| Rx | Not available. | n/a | n/a | No FDA approval, no human IND on public record. |
| Avoid | International unknown vendors, "white-label" Alibaba, vendors without published COA | n/a | very low | Uncoupler chemotypes are particularly purity-sensitive — a 5-10% impurity of a more-toxic uncoupler analog (DNP, structurally similar protonophores) could shift the safety profile dramatically without the user knowing. |
Cost math (if the user overrides verdict — not recommended):
- One 4-week cycle at 25 mg/day = 700 mg total. At 1g vendor pricing ($50-120), one cycle costs ~$35-85 in raw material — cheap. Cost is not a barrier.
- The real cost is the safety-uncertainty premium and the bloodwork (CBC, CMP, lipid, fasting insulin, ALT/AST, TSH/T3/T4 pre/post = ~$150-350 if not covered).
- Cost is not the reason to avoid this compound. The reason is the absent human safety data + lethal mechanism class precedent + no plausible benefit profile for this user.
Quality verification on receipt:
- COA: ≥98% purity by HPLC, ideally with mass spec confirmation, lot number traceable
- For powder form: appearance should be pale yellow to off-white crystalline solid; bright yellow or orange suggests DNP contamination — discard
- Reconstitution / dissolution test (if liquid product): solution should be clear; cloudiness or particulates → discard
- Third-party independent test (recommended for any user who overrides verdict): Janoshik Analytical or similar offers independent research-chem testing. For an uncoupler, paying $40-80 for independent analysis on a representative lot is appropriate due diligence — purity matters more here than for most research chems because of the structural similarity to DNP.
▸ Biomarkers to track (deep)
Baseline (before any cycle, if user overrides verdict — not recommended)
- CBC, CMP, lipid panel, hsCRP, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c — full V4-baseline bloodwork (already planned for June 2026)
- ALT, AST, GGT, alkaline phosphatase — hepatic markers; BAM-15 has hepatic exposure and substrate-flux load on the liver
- TSH, free T3, free T4 — thyroid function; baseline before adding any thermogenic agent
- Body composition (DEXA preferred) — fat %, lean mass, visceral fat
- Resting heart rate, HRV (Whoop / Oura) — autonomic baseline; key safety signal during cycle
- Resting AM oral temperature — hourly logging in week 1, daily thereafter; key safety signal
- Resting blood pressure
- ECG (12-lead) baseline — particularly important given mechanism class cardiac risk
- Urinary catecholamines (research-tier; if accessible) — adrenergic load baseline
- Subjective baseline log: sleep quality, RPE during training, recovery, appetite, perceived warmth at rest
During cycle
- Daily AM oral temperature for the first 7 days, then 3×/week
- Daily resting HR (first thing in the morning) for the first 14 days
- Adverse event log — palpitations, sweating disproportionate to environment, fatigue, sleep disruption, headache, GI symptoms
- Mid-cycle bloodwork (day 14): ALT, AST, CMP, fasting glucose, lipid panel
- Body composition mid-cycle (week 3-4)
Post-cycle (2 weeks after stop)
- Repeat full bloodwork: CBC, CMP (especially ALT, AST), fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, lipid panel, hsCRP, TSH/T3/T4
- Repeat body composition (DEXA)
- Repeat ECG (cardiac safety reassurance)
- Subjective recap: clear signal vs nothing? worth continuing? any abnormal lab → discontinue permanently and do not re-cycle
Decision rule: if pre/post bloodwork shows any abnormality (especially hepatic, thyroid, or cardiac), discontinue permanently. If resting temperature climbed >37.8°C at any point during cycle, discontinue immediately and do not re-cycle. Default expectation for a 20yo lean athlete: there will be no positive signal worth the risk profile, and the rational decision will be to drop the compound until a human Phase 1 reads out.
▸ Controversies / open debates Live debate
- Does the rodent therapeutic index translate to humans? This is the central unanswered question. Mouse mitochondria differ from human in cardiolipin composition, UCP expression, brown-fat density, basal metabolic rate, and thermoregulatory capacity. The "wider therapeutic index than DNP" claim has been demonstrated in mice and in cell culture — not in humans. Until a Phase 1 reads out, this is a hypothesis.
- Cardiac safety unknown. Cardiomyocytes are mitochondria-dense and oxidative. Uncoupling could be protective (reduced ROS under reperfusion) or harmful (impaired cardiac output during exertion, arrhythmia). No human cardiac data.
- Long-term oncology unknown. Uncoupling alters ROS, NAD+/NADH, AMPK signaling — all of which interact with tumor biology in context-dependent ways. Some uncoupler precedents (DNP) have been associated with hematologic toxicity historically; whether BAM-15 carries any oncology signal is unknown.
- Why hasn't a sponsor filed an IND? As of May 2026, no public IND, no registered trial. For a molecule with this mouse data quality, the absence is conspicuous. Possible explanations: (a) commercial unattractiveness given the GLP-1 dominance in obesity, (b) regulatory hurdles for a DNP-class compound, (c) the safety package required for IND is more demanding than the mouse data suggests, (d) sponsors are accumulating data before filing.
- Vendor purity in an uncoupler class is uniquely concerning. A 5-10% contamination with a more toxic uncoupler analog (DNP, FCCP, structurally similar protonophores) would shift the safety profile dramatically without the user's knowledge. Independent third-party HPLC + MS testing is appropriate due diligence for any user who overrides the verdict.
- WADA status drift. Not currently named, but mechanism falls under S4.4 catch-all. WADA has named similar metabolic-modulator compounds within 1-2 years of community uptake (MOTS-c added 2024). Expect BAM-15 to be explicitly named on the Prohibited List within 1-3 years if community use spreads.
- Verdict-confidence honesty. I am marking this SKIP-FOR-NOW with HIGH confidence for this user (not for the molecule in general; in a different demographic the verdict could be SKIP-FOR-NOW with MODERATE confidence). The rationale concentration:
- Mechanism class has killed dozens of users (DNP).
- BAM-15's "safer" claim is mouse-only.
- Zero published human Phase 1.
- No IND, no registered trial.
- The user is a 20yo lean MMA athlete with no fat-loss goal, no body-composition complaint.
- Mechanism actively reduces ATP yield (works against his performance goal).
- Cleaner FDA-approved alternatives exist if a fat-loss scenario ever emerges (semaglutide, tirzepatide, retatrutide).
- What would change verdict to WATCH-LIST or NEUTRAL: (a) published human Phase 1 with clean safety + PK data, (b) FDA IND filing, (c) the user develops a clinical fat-loss need that GLP-1 agonists fail to address (extremely unlikely scenario), (d) the user retires from competition and shifts to a sedentary phase (still wouldn't justify; GLP-1s remain better).
- What would not change verdict: more rodent papers, more anecdotal community reports, vendor expansion, lower prices.
▸ Verdict change log
- 2026-05-10 — Initial verdict: SKIP-FOR-NOW (HIGH confidence). BAM-15 is an investigational small-molecule mitochondrial protonophore (aromatic furazano-bis-imidazole, ~401 Da) developed by the Kenwood / Hoehn group as a tissue-targeted reimagining of DNP — selective for the inner mitochondrial membrane without depolarizing the plasma membrane. The Kenwood 2014 (foundational), Childress 2018 (selectivity), and Alexopoulos 2020 (efficacy in DIO mice) papers establish a coherent rodent case for fat loss + NAFLD reversal + insulin sensitization without observable hyperthermia at therapeutic doses. Zero human Phase 1, zero registered human trials, no IND on public record as of May 2026. Mechanism class (DNP protonophores) has killed dozens of users from hyperthermia and continues to kill in the bodybuilding underground. For this user (20yo lean MMA athlete + business owner): no fat-loss goal, no body-composition complaint, mechanism reduces ATP yield (works against athletic output), high heat-stress training environment compounds risk, and cleaner FDA-approved alternatives (semaglutide, tirzepatide, retatrutide) exist for any future fat-loss scenario. Sourcing is research-chem-only with concerning purity-stakes given structural similarity to DNP. Best-case use: defer entirely until any human Phase 1 reads out OR until the user develops a clinical fat-loss need that GLP-1 agonists fail to address (unlikely scenario). Re-evaluate annually. Related compounds in same conceptual space: DNP (parent class, banned), Cardarine / GW-501516 (PPARδ exercise-mimetic, abandoned over rat carcinogenicity), SLU-PP-332 (ERR pan-agonist, also research-chem WATCH-LIST), MOTS-c (AMPK exercise-mimetic), semaglutide / tirzepatide / retatrutide (FDA-approved fat-loss alternatives).
▸ Open questions / gaps Open
- First human Phase 1 readout. None registered as of May 2026. Whoever runs the first human PK/safety study will define the field. Track ClinicalTrials.gov quarterly under search terms "BAM-15," "BAM15," "mitochondrial uncoupler," "Continuum Biosciences," and Kenwood / Hoehn affiliation.
- FDA IND filing. No public IND for BAM-15. Filing would be a major credibility signal.
- Chronic rodent oncology study. No published long-term carcinogenicity protocol. Critical gap given the DNP-class history of hematologic and hepatic toxicity.
- Cardiac safety in rodents at exercise / heat-stress. Most rodent data is in standard housing conditions. Cardiac and thermoregulatory safety under exertion or heat stress is the most directly relevant safety question for human use, and the most underexplored in the literature.
- Independent in vivo replication of Alexopoulos 2020. The fat-loss / NAFLD reversal data deserves independent-lab replication.
- Human PK / metabolism / hepatic clearance pathway. Uncharacterized publicly.
- CNS penetration. Unknown whether BAM-15 crosses the blood-brain barrier. Mitochondrial uncoupling in CNS could affect cognition, mood, sleep.
- WADA explicit naming and detection assay. Not yet named, but mechanism plausibly under S4.4 catch-all. Detection assay development would shift status.
- Vendor purity standardization. Independent third-party testing across major vendors is critical given structural similarity to DNP. As of May 2026 this work has not been systematically published.
- Bloodwork-validated personal-response decision rule. If a Phase 1 ever reads out, the cleanest user-level decision rule will be pre/post hepatic markers, lipid panel, body composition, resting temperature, resting HR. Until then, no individual-user decision rule is well-anchored.
References
Kenwood et al. 2014, Mol Metab — Identification of a novel mitochondrial uncoupler that does not depolarize the plasma membrane (PMID 24567905)
foundational discovery paper
View StudyAlexopoulos et al. 2020, Nature Communications — Mitochondrial uncoupler BAM15 reverses diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in mice (PMID 32514028)
headline mouse efficacy paper
View StudyChildress et al. 2018, J Med Chem — Small molecule mitochondrial uncouplers and their therapeutic potential (PMID 29986145)
tissue selectivity vs DNP
View StudyGoedeke & Shulman 2021, Mol Metab review — Therapeutic potential of mitochondrial uncouplers for the treatment of MAFLD and NASH
context review
View StudyTao et al. 2014, Nat Med — Niclosamide ethanolamine-induced mild mitochondrial uncoupling improves diabetic symptoms in mice
parallel uncoupler chemotype
View StudyContinuum Biosciences (NDA Mitochondria) — corporate development site
company developing BAM-15 / analogs
View SourceWADA 2026 Prohibited List
S4.4 Metabolic Modulators is the relevant catch-all
View SourceUSADA — overview of S4 Metabolic Modulators
anti-doping classification for the mechanism class
View SourceClinicalTrials.gov — search for "BAM-15" / "BAM15"
registration tracker (zero registered human trials as of May 2026)
View SourceUCP1 / UCP2 / UCP3 Wikipedia — endogenous uncoupling proteins
biological context for engineered uncoupling
View SourceJanoshik Analytical — independent peptide/research-chem testing service
third-party verification option for vendor lot quality
View SourceHow was your experience with this compound?
Anonymous · one vote per session · results below at 5+ votes.
See something off?
Most of this wiki is AI-generated. Suggest a correction, dosing update, or new evidence — we review every submission.