This page describes pharmacological agents that may have legal restrictions, side effects, and drug interactions in your jurisdiction. Information is for educational research only — consult a clinician before considering any compound.
DHT
Surface here is educational only; do not use without medical supervision. Our editorial verdict is SKIP-FOR-NOW — current cost / risk / redundancy puts it below the line.
Our depth — beyond the mirror
Deeper analysis, verdict reasoning, and per-archetype recommendations from our research team.
▸ Editor's verdict SKIP-FOR-NOW HIGH
'For a 20yo MMA athlete with peak endogenous testosterone and DHT, intact HPG axis, no documented hypogonadism, no gynecomastia, no micropenis, and no prostate concerns, exogenous DHT is unambiguously SKIP-FOR-NOW. The endogenous physiology is already operating at lifetime peak. Adding exogenous DHT delivers no benefit while introducing hair loss + prostate + lipid risks MORE aggressively than even testosterone — because DHT does not aromatize, the protective E2 effects on HDL, bone, mood, and libido are absent. The non-aromatizing "feature" that makes DHT clinically useful in EU indications (gynecomastia regression via paradoxical AR competition, hypogonadism with prior E2 sensitivity, pediatric micropenis without bone-age advancement) is irrelevant to a young eugonadal athlete. Hair loss specifically: DHT is the proximate molecular driver of androgenic alopecia — exogenous DHT bypasses the 5αR conversion step that finasteride/dutasteride block, so MPB cannot be pharmacologically rescued during exogenous DHT exposure. Prostate: dose-dependent BPH driver; risk minimal at 20 but compounds with chronic exposure. WADA S1.1 banned (mass spec detection for exogenous DHT distinguishable from endogenous via IRMS). Combat sport context: no athletic performance, recovery, or cognitive benefit beyond what endogenous DHT already provides. Verdict reverses ONLY if user develops documented hypogonadism with severe E2 sensitivity OR treatment-refractory idiopathic/hypogonadal gynecomastia AND age >35 AND under endocrinology supervision in a country where Andractim is legally available — clinically implausible for this user now or in the foreseeable future. If exogenous androgen ever becomes appropriate (35+ with documented persistent hypogonadism after enclomiphene-first trial), the conversation starts with testosterone (the parent molecule), and DHT enters only if T-induced E2 elevation produces specific problems. The hair-loss + prostate dimension makes DHT riskier than even testosterone for a young athlete.'
▸ Decision matrix by user profile Per-archetype
| Archetype | Verdict | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
★20-30, brain-priority, high cognitive workload, combat athlete with peak endogenous T (this user) | SKIP-FOR-NOW | Same-family AAS skip-at-20 logic + DHT-specific hair-loss + prostate dimension. No cognitive benefit, no meaningful athletic performance benefit, no recovery benefit, real HPG suppression risk during axis maturation, accelerated hair loss in predisposed users (worst possible compound for this), atherogenic lipid changes (worse on HDL than aromatizing AAS), gray-market supply chain. Reconsider only post-35 with documented hypogonadism + severe E2 issues on standard TRT — clinically implausible for this user. |
20-30 with documented hypogonadism | SKIP | in favor of first-line interventions (enclomiphene, hCG, then testosterone if those fail). DHT enters only if T-induced E2 issues develop and standard AI management fails. |
30-50, executive maintenance with documented hypogonadism + treatment-refractory gynecomastia on standard TRT | OPTIONAL | niche — the canonical EU Andractim use case. Endocrinology supervision required. |
30-50, idiopathic gynecomastia >18 months (any cause) | OPTIONAL | niche — Andractim 125 mg BID × 4-20 weeks is established EU treatment (PMID 6354523). US patients require travel or off-label compounding. |
Pediatric idiopathic micropenis | OPTIONAL | niche — Andractim 5 mg/d × 3 mo under pediatric endocrinology supervision (PMC10619192). Specialist context only. |
50+, BPH or symptomatic prostate | CONTRAINDICATED | DHT is the proximate driver of BPH; exogenous DHT compounds prostate volume risk. |
Hair-loss predisposition / family history of male-pattern baldness | CONTRAINDICATED | DHT is the proximate molecular driver of androgenic alopecia; exogenous DHT cannot be pharmacologically rescued by 5αR-inhibitors during exposure. Worst possible compound choice for this profile. |
Anxiety-prone | CAUTION | DHT-class CNS effects can drive irritability / aggression / mood lability in susceptible users. |
High athletic load, tested status (NCAA, USADA, WADA, professional combat sport) | SKIP-PERMANENT | during testing window — S1.1 banned, ~1-2 week detection window via urine LC-MS/MS + IRMS. |
High athletic load, untested status (this user) | SKIP | as default. Risk profile (HPG suppression, atherogenic dyslipidemia, hair loss, gray-market supply) is independent of testing status. Compound provides no athletic performance benefit relevant to combat sport. |
Sleep-disordered | SKIP | Address sleep first; DHT has no role. |
Recovery-focused (post-injury, post-illness, healthy young) | SKIP | BPC-157, TB-500 are far better-fit. |
Cosmetic / contest-prep focused | D | (Masteron) is the canonical compound, not raw DHT — DHT-derivatives with 3α-HSD blocking dominate this use case. Raw DHT is muscle-inactivated and underperforms drostanolone for cosmetic effect. |
- ★20-30, brain-priority, high cognitive workload, combat athlete with peak endogenous T (this user)SKIP-FOR-NOW
Same-family AAS skip-at-20 logic + DHT-specific hair-loss + prostate dimension. No cognitive benefit, no meaningful athletic performance benefit, no recovery benefit, real HPG suppression risk during axis maturation, accelerated hair loss in predisposed users (worst possible compound for this), atherogenic lipid changes (worse on HDL than aromatizing AAS), gray-market supply chain. Reconsider only post-35 with documented hypogonadism + severe E2 issues on standard TRT — clinically implausible for this user.
- 20-30 with documented hypogonadismSKIP
in favor of first-line interventions (enclomiphene, hCG, then testosterone if those fail). DHT enters only if T-induced E2 issues develop and standard AI management fails.
- 30-50, executive maintenance with documented hypogonadism + treatment-refractory gynecomastia on standard TRTOPTIONAL
niche — the canonical EU Andractim use case. Endocrinology supervision required.
- 30-50, idiopathic gynecomastia >18 months (any cause)OPTIONAL
niche — Andractim 125 mg BID × 4-20 weeks is established EU treatment (PMID 6354523). US patients require travel or off-label compounding.
- Pediatric idiopathic micropenisOPTIONAL
niche — Andractim 5 mg/d × 3 mo under pediatric endocrinology supervision (PMC10619192). Specialist context only.
- 50+, BPH or symptomatic prostateCONTRAINDICATED
DHT is the proximate driver of BPH; exogenous DHT compounds prostate volume risk.
- Hair-loss predisposition / family history of male-pattern baldnessCONTRAINDICATED
DHT is the proximate molecular driver of androgenic alopecia; exogenous DHT cannot be pharmacologically rescued by 5αR-inhibitors during exposure. Worst possible compound choice for this profile.
- Anxiety-proneCAUTION
DHT-class CNS effects can drive irritability / aggression / mood lability in susceptible users.
- High athletic load, tested status (NCAA, USADA, WADA, professional combat sport)SKIP-PERMANENT
during testing window — S1.1 banned, ~1-2 week detection window via urine LC-MS/MS + IRMS.
- High athletic load, untested status (this user)SKIP
as default. Risk profile (HPG suppression, atherogenic dyslipidemia, hair loss, gray-market supply) is independent of testing status. Compound provides no athletic performance benefit relevant to combat sport.
- Sleep-disorderedSKIP
Address sleep first; DHT has no role.
- Recovery-focused (post-injury, post-illness, healthy young)SKIP
BPC-157, TB-500 are far better-fit.
- Cosmetic / contest-prep focusedD
(Masteron) is the canonical compound, not raw DHT — DHT-derivatives with 3α-HSD blocking dominate this use case. Raw DHT is muscle-inactivated and underperforms drostanolone for cosmetic effect.
▸ Subjective experience (deep)
At Andractim clinical doses (125-250 mg/d transdermal, 6-24 month courses)
- Day 1-7: Establishing topical application technique. Subtle initial effects: morning erections may improve subtly; mood/drive shifts minimal at this stage.
- Week 1-4: First subjective signals — gradual erection quality improvement (the Kunelius 2002 signal at week 12 emerges around here), libido shifts subtle but present. Sebum / oily skin uptick in some users. Notable absence of the dopaminergic/E2-mediated hedonic surge characteristic of T-class compounds — DHT delivers AR signaling but not the "feel-good" neurochemical layer.
- Week 4-12: Peak effects: stable AR-mediated phenotype — modestly elevated drive, erection quality, lean tissue tone in low-BF states. Hair shedding may emerge in genetically predisposed users (visible scalp recession at temples/vertex over 8-12 weeks). Hematocrit rising — first lab check at week 8-12.
- Month 3-6: Full hematologic + lipid response. HDL drop typical (DHT-class non-aromatizing → no E2 HDL preservation, drops more than T at equivalent androgenic exposure). PSA stable in most studies (Idan 2010, Kunelius 2002 — no PSA elevation at 6-24 months). Alopecia progresses in susceptible users.
- Off-cycle: Gel washout fast — apparent serum t½ 24-48h means DHT clears within ~7 days of last application. HPG axis suppression usually milder than T-class (no E2 contribution to feedback) — recovery 4-8 weeks typical. Hair loss progression in predisposed users may be partially permanent.
Characteristic effects
- "Dry, vascular, lean" appearance in low-body-fat states (analogous to drostanolone, but raw DHT inactivated more rapidly in muscle tissue → less anabolic muscle effect)
- Modest libido shifts (initially up via SHBG displacement / free-T elevation, varied subsequent course)
- Erection quality improvement in hypogonadal contexts (Kunelius signal)
- Hair shedding / scalp thinning in genetically predisposed users (DHT is the proximate molecular driver; finasteride / dutasteride cannot rescue because exogenous DHT bypasses the conversion step they block)
- Acne / oily skin in susceptible users (sebaceous gland AR activation — DHT is the dominant androgen at sebaceous glands)
- Prostate effects: BPH driver dose-dependently; minimal at low doses + short duration (Idan 2010 showed no volume change at 24 mo at 70 mg/d — but caveat: dose moderate, healthy middle-aged cohort)
- Mild prostate / urinary symptoms in older users
What users do NOT report
- Strong muscle-building effect (3α-HSD inactivation in muscle limits anabolic potency vs DHT-derivative AAS)
- Significant strength gain
- Cognitive enhancement
- Recovery acceleration
- Fat loss beyond what diet produces
- Mood elevation comparable to T (E2 contribution absent → "drier" psychological profile)
- "Pump" or "fullness" beyond what training produces
▸ Tolerance + cycling deep dive
- Tolerance buildup: AR receptor downregulation occurs with all sustained AR agonism. DHT-specific tolerance not well-characterized but follows standard AAS pattern.
- Recommended cycle (clinical, NOT bodybuilder): Per indication. Andractim courses typically 3-12 months for hypogonadism/gynecomastia/micropenis indications, with reassessment.
- Reset protocol: Off-course 8+ weeks; HPG recovery typically faster than T-class esters (no E2 contribution to feedback). Endogenous DHT recovers as endogenous T recovers (5αR activity is constitutive).
▸ Stacking deep dive
Synergistic with — none recommended for this user
- Endogenous DHT physiology functions as one component of the integrated androgen system; "stacking" exogenous DHT with anything else is rarely indicated outside niche EU clinical contexts.
Avoid stacking with
- Finasteride / dutasteride: Mechanistic opposites. Finasteride/dutasteride suppress endogenous DHT by blocking T → DHT conversion; exogenous DHT bypasses this entirely. Combining is conceptually nonsensical.
- Testosterone (TRT): Most TRT effects are AR-mediated (DHT downstream of T) or E2-mediated (aromatization). DHT delivers AR signaling alone. Stacking is rare; usually one or the other. Adding DHT to T compounds HPG suppression without proportional benefit.
- Anastrozole / letrozole (aromatase inhibitors): DHT cannot aromatize. AI on top of DHT has nothing to inhibit (other than residual endogenous T → E2). Crashes E2 too low → joint pain, mood issues, lipid worsening, libido collapse.
- DHT-derivative AAS (Masteron, Anavar, Primobolan, Winstrol): All DHT-derivatives stabilize against muscle 3α-HSD inactivation via various ring modifications. Stacking with raw DHT compounds androgenic side effects (hair, prostate, skin, lipids) without proportional muscle-building gain. Particularly bad for hair-loss-predisposed users.
- Oral 17α-alkylated AAS (methyltestosterone, oxymetholone): Hepatotoxic + redundant. Combining strictly dominated by transdermal-only.
- Hair-loss treatments (oral finasteride/dutasteride, topical RU58841, minoxidil): Conflicting goals. Using minoxidil to mitigate damage from a compound you're voluntarily taking is unusual.
Neutral / safe co-administration
- Most non-hormonal nootropics (modafinil, citicoline, NAC, magnesium, fish oil) — no direct interaction. Issue is not pharmacological collision but underlying inappropriateness of exogenous DHT in healthy young eugonadal male.
▸ Drug interactions deep dive
- Warfarin / DOACs: AAS class generally potentiates warfarin via decreased clotting factor synthesis → INR monitoring required, dose reduction often needed.
- Insulin / oral hypoglycemics: Modest insulin sensitivity changes possible; less pronounced with DHT than aromatizing T.
- CYP-mediated metabolism: DHT is metabolized via 3α/3β-HSD pathways and CYP enzymes; clinically significant CYP-mediated drug interactions not well-characterized for DHT specifically.
- Hepatotoxicity: Transdermal DHT (Andractim) avoids first-pass hepatic exposure → minimal hepatotoxicity vs oral 17α-alkylated AAS. This is a key advantage of the transdermal route.
- Detection (WADA): S1.1 prohibited. Detection via urine LC-MS/MS for parent + metabolites; IRMS (carbon isotope ratio) used to distinguish exogenous DHT from endogenous DHT (since DHT exists naturally). Detection window for transdermal Andractim ~1-2 weeks after last application.
▸ Pharmacogenomics
- AR (androgen receptor) CAG repeat length: Shorter CAG repeats = stronger AR signaling per unit ligand. Users with shorter repeats experience more pronounced androgenic side effects (hair loss, prostate, skin) at any given dose. DHT is a potent peripheral androgen — for users with shorter CAG repeats and male-pattern baldness predisposition, exogenous DHT is among the most aggressive compound choices for accelerating hair loss.
- SRD5A1 / SRD5A2 variants: Polymorphisms affect endogenous T → DHT conversion rates; less relevant for exogenous DHT (which bypasses 5αR). Variants may modulate baseline endogenous DHT and tissue distribution.
- CYP19 (aromatase) polymorphisms: Irrelevant for exogenous DHT (which cannot aromatize). Relevant for understanding individual baseline T → E2 conversion rates and how that interacts with the rationale for choosing DHT over T.
- Practical note: No pharmacogenomic test changes the SKIP-FOR-NOW verdict. The user's June 2026 23andMe may include AR CAG / SRD5A1/2 SNPs but interpretation will not change the SKIP recommendation. AR CAG repeats may be informative for future hair-loss-risk assessment if DHT or DHT-derivative AAS is ever considered.
▸ Sourcing deep dive
| Path | Vendor | Cost | Reliability | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rx (US) | None | N/A | N/A | No FDA-approved indication. No legitimate US Rx pathway exists. |
| EU prescription (Andractim) | Besins Healthcare via FR/BE/NL pharmacies | ~€40-80 / 80 g tube | High | Pharmaceutical-grade, prescription-required, EU pharmacy chain of custody. Not legally importable to US without IND. Travel + EU prescription needed. |
| Compounding pharmacy (limited US contexts) | Specialized hormone clinics | Variable | Medium | Some US compounding pharmacies prepare transdermal DHT cream off-label via off-shore active pharmaceutical ingredient sourcing. Quality + sourcing variable. Legal exposure varies. |
| Gray-market UGL | "Research lab" suppliers | Variable | Low | Online "transdermal DHT" or "androstanolone gel" from research-chem vendors — unregulated. Active concentration may differ from labeled, transdermal absorption variable, contamination possible. Substitution with cheaper compounds (mesterolone, methyltestosterone) economically incentivized. |
| Veterinary | None | N/A | N/A | No veterinary use case. |
For this user
Sourcing is solvable but irrelevant — no clinical indication. Skip the compound, do not engage the sourcing question.
▸ Biomarkers to track (deep)
- Baseline (before starting): Total + free testosterone, SHBG, LH, FSH, E2 (sensitive assay), DHT (LC-MS/MS preferred), prolactin, full lipid panel (LDL, HDL, total cholesterol, triglycerides, ApoB, ideally Lp(a)), ALT, AST, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, total + direct bilirubin, CBC (hematocrit), HbA1c, fasting glucose, eGFR, blood pressure, PSA, semen analysis (if fertility-relevant), echocardiogram if multi-course intent, hair density photos (frontal hairline, temples, crown — baseline for tracking AAS-driven progression — particularly critical for DHT given proximate-driver role), prostate volume on ultrasound baseline if >40 yo or family history of prostate cancer.
- During use (week 4-8): ALT, AST, GGT (less critical with transdermal route), full lipid panel, blood pressure, hematocrit, hair photos. Flag if HDL drops >50%, BP >140/90, or visible hairline recession.
- End of course: Full HPG panel (T, LH, FSH, E2, DHT) to quantify suppression; lipids; hair photos for end-of-course baseline; PSA recheck.
- Post-cycle: HPG recovery check at week 4-8; full lipid recovery check at week 8-12; hair photos at 8-12 weeks (assess whether shedding has stabilized or progressed).
- Long-term (multi-course users): Annual lipid trends, periodic echocardiogram, formal CVD risk recalculation, ongoing hair density photos, PSA + prostate volume monitoring.
▸ Controversies / open debates Live debate
1. Is DHT primarily a circulating hormone or autocrine/paracrine signal?
Claim: DHT is the most potent circulating androgen and serum DHT levels meaningfully drive prostate / scalp / skin androgenicity.
Reality: Page 2011 (PMC3048323) RCT showed serum DHT does NOT meaningfully translate to intra-prostatic androgen exposure. DHT functions primarily as an autocrine/paracrine signal — produced locally from T by tissue-specific 5αR isoenzymes, acting locally, with limited systemic spillover. This reframes the safety profile of exogenous DHT (Andractim 2010 24-month RCT showed no prostate volume increase) and explains why finasteride/dutasteride blocking 5αR is more effective for prostate/scalp endpoints than measuring + reducing serum DHT directly.
2. Can DHT replace testosterone clinically?
Idan 2010 (PMID 21079217) and Sartorius 2014 (PMID 24521101) demonstrated that pure-AR androgen replacement (DHT-only) preserves sexual function and does not increase prostate volume in middle-aged + older men. In principle DHT can substitute for T in selected hypogonadism contexts. However: bone health, lipid profile, mood, and erythropoiesis effects of T-only replacement in eugonadal men depend partly on E2 contribution; DHT-only replacement may underperform T+AI on some endpoints despite cleaner cosmetic + prostate profile. This is an open clinical question — Andractim is approved for hypogonadism in EU but rarely first-line over T.
3. Is the "DHT causes hair loss" framing complete?
DHT is the proximate molecular driver of androgenic alopecia in genetically susceptible men, but the genetic susceptibility (AR CAG repeat length, paternal + maternal lineage genetics, follicle-specific 5αR expression) is what determines whether elevated DHT actually causes hair loss in a given individual. Endogenous DHT in eugonadal men is harmless to most follicles; only susceptible follicles (frontal, vertex) miniaturize. Exogenous DHT shifts the dose-response curve, causing visible hair loss earlier in genetically susceptible users than they would experience from endogenous DHT alone. The framing "DHT causes hair loss" is correct but should be "DHT is the proximate driver of androgenic alopecia in genetically susceptible follicles."
4. Bodybuilding context — why drostanolone instead of raw DHT?
The 3α-HSD inactivation in skeletal muscle limits raw DHT's anabolic potency. DHT-derivative AAS (drostanolone, oxandrolone, methenolone, stanozolol) all carry ring modifications that block 3α-HSD inactivation, preserving AR signaling in muscle. For cosmetic + anabolic bodybuilding contexts, DHT-derivatives dominate; raw DHT is muscle-inactivated and underperforms. This is why drostanolone (2α-methyl-DHT) is the canonical "Masteron" hardening compound, not raw DHT itself.
5. Brain-development concerns at 20
Same-family AAS concern: AR signaling is active in CNS regions including hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex; supraphysiologic AAS exposure during ongoing prefrontal maturation (continues into mid-20s) is largely unstudied for cognitive endpoints. Behavioral / mood literature on adolescent AAS use shows elevated rates of mood disorder and aggression but is confounded. DHT-specific data is sparser than testosterone-class compounds but the AR-mediated mechanism is the same. Precautionary case favors skip, particularly given this user's brain-priority framing.
6. WADA detection window for exogenous DHT
Distinguishing exogenous DHT from endogenous DHT requires IRMS (carbon isotope ratio mass spectrometry), since DHT is naturally present in human serum. Pharmaceutical-grade DHT (synthesized from cholesterol via plant sterols or partial synthesis) typically has a δ¹³C signature distinct from endogenous DHT (synthesized from dietary cholesterol). IRMS analysis is more expensive than standard LC-MS/MS and is reserved for confirmatory testing. Detection window for transdermal Andractim ~1-2 weeks; longer for chronic exposure.
7. Pediatric micropenis indication — ethical considerations
The Karrou 2023 (PMC10619192) RCT validates Andractim 5 mg/d × 3 mo for idiopathic micropenis with average penile growth 2.37 cm, comparable to T enanthate but without bone-age advancement risk. Pediatric endocrinology accepts this as a legitimate indication. The ethical considerations (defining micropenis, consent in pediatric populations, long-term outcomes, cultural pressure) are real but outside this user profile's scope.
▸ Verdict change log
- 2026-05-10 (this file, initial entry) — SKIP-FOR-NOW HIGH confidence. First entry. Mechanism + evidence + endogenous physiology + exogenous use cases + hair-loss-driver framing reviewed. For 20yo MMA athlete with peak endogenous T+DHT and no clinical indication, exogenous DHT delivers no benefit while introducing hair loss + prostate + lipid risks more aggressively than even testosterone. The hair-loss dimension specifically makes DHT riskier than T for a young athlete (proximate driver, not pharmacologically rescue-able by 5αR-inhibitors). Verdict reverses ONLY post-35 with documented hypogonadism + severe E2 issues on standard TRT — clinically implausible for this user.
▸ Open questions / gaps Open
- DHT's role in cardiovascular risk independent of T: LeBlanc 2021 observational signal of higher DHT → fewer hip fractures conflicts with the cardiovascular toxicity literature on AAS-class chronic exposure. Mechanism unclear; longitudinal interventional data sparse.
- Long-term exogenous DHT and prostate cancer risk: Idan 2010 24-month RCT showed no prostate volume increase, but 24 months is short for prostate cancer endpoint. Longer-term cohort data sparse.
- Brain-development effects of supraphysiologic AR activation in 20-25yo prefrontal maturation window: Largely unstudied across AAS class.
- DHT-only replacement vs T+AI replacement long-term outcomes: Open question; head-to-head RCTs lacking.
- Backdoor pathway clinical relevance: Operative in CAH, PCOS, CRPC, but unclear how much it contributes to "normal" DHT in healthy adults.
- AR CAG repeat × exogenous DHT interaction: Susceptibility differences across AR CAG repeat lengths well-characterized for endogenous DHT; exogenous DHT interactions less well-quantified.
▸ Cross-references
- testosterone — parent molecule of DHT; foundational AAS / HRT compound; SKIP-AT-20 absent documented hypogonadism. If exogenous androgen ever appropriate, conversation starts here.
- finasteride — Type 2 5αR inhibitor; ~70% serum DHT reduction; FDA-approved for MPB + BPH; mechanistic opposite of exogenous DHT.
- dutasteride — Dual Type 1+2 5αR inhibitor; ~95% serum DHT reduction; FDA-approved for BPH; off-label for MPB.
- masteron (drostanolone) / masteron-enanthate — 2α-methyl-DHT; 3α-HSD-stable; the canonical "DHT-class hardening" bodybuilding AAS.
- anavar (oxandrolone) — 17α-alkyl + 2-oxa DHT-derivative; FDA-approved for catabolic states; oral; 3α-HSD-stable.
- primobolan (methenolone) — 1-methyl DHT-derivative; "lean tissue" reputation; injectable + oral forms; 3α-HSD-stable.
References
Imperato-McGinley J et al. (1996). "5α-reductase-2 gene mutations in the Dominican Republic." *J Clin Endocrinol Metab* 81(11):4116-4120. PMID: 8626825.
Foundational SRD5A2 kindred study; molecular basis of guevedoces.
View StudyKunelius P et al. (2002). "The effects of transdermal dihydrotestosterone in the aging male: a prospective, randomized, double blind study." *J Clin Endocrinol Metab* 87(4):1467-1472. PMID: 11932266.
Anchor RCT for clinical Andractim use; 6-month transdermal DHT in 120 aging men.
View StudyIdan A, Griffiths KA, Harwood DT et al. (2010). "Long-term effects of dihydrotestosterone treatment on prostate growth in healthy, middle-aged men without prostate disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial." *Annals of Internal Medicine* 153(10):621-632. PMID: 21079217.
24-month RCT, foundational long-term safety data; no prostate volume increase.
View StudyPage ST et al. (2011). "Dihydrotestosterone administration does not increase intraprostatic androgen concentrations or alter prostate androgen action in healthy men: a randomized-controlled trial." *J Clin Endocrinol Metab* 96(2):430-437.
Reframes DHT as autocrine/paracrine signal; serum DHT does not translate to intra-prostatic exposure.
View StudySartorius GA et al. (2014). "Male sexual function can be maintained without aromatization: randomized placebo-controlled trial of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in healthy, older men for 24 months." *J Sex Med* 11(10):2562-2570. PMID: 24521101.
Long-term DHT preserves sexual function without aromatization.
View StudyLeBlanc ES et al. (2021). "Testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, bone density, and hip fracture risk among older men: The Cardiovascular Health Study." *Metabolism* 114:154399. PMID: 33058848.
Each SD DHT → 26% lower hip fracture risk; observational.
View StudyEberle J et al. (1982). "Gynecomastia: effect of prolonged treatment with dihydrotestosterone by the percutaneous route." *Schweiz Med Wochenschr* 112(23):873-876. PMID: 6220269.
Pubertal/idiopathic/hypogonadal gynecomastia regression with percutaneous DHT.
View StudyWickramatunga MN et al. (1983). "Studies on the treatment of idiopathic gynaecomastia with percutaneous dihydrotestosterone." *Clin Endocrinol* 19(4):461-468. PMID: 6354523.
N=40 idiopathic gynecomastia trial; foundational indication paper.
View StudyKarrou M et al. (2023). "Efficacy of transdermal dihydrotestosterone and testosterone enanthate for penile augmentation in patients with idiopathic micropenis: a comparative randomized study." *Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes* 16:11795514231208328.
Modern pediatric endocrinology RCT; 2.37 cm gain on Andractim.
View StudyAuchus RJ. (2004). "The backdoor pathway to dihydrotestosterone." *Trends Endocrinol Metab* 15(9):432-438. PMID: 15519890.
Alternative DHT biosynthesis pathway; relevance to CAH, PCOS, CRPC.
View StudyMarchetti PM, Barth JH. (2013). "Clinical biochemistry of dihydrotestosterone." *Ann Clin Biochem* 50(2):95-107. PMID: 23440717.
Modern DHT clinical biochemistry review.
View StudySwerdloff RS et al. (2017). "Dihydrotestosterone: biochemistry, physiology, and clinical implications of elevated blood levels." *Endocr Rev* 38(3):220-254.
Authoritative Endocrine Reviews synthesis.
View StudySaartok T, Dahlberg E, Gustafsson JA. (1984). "Relative binding affinity of anabolic-androgenic steroids: comparison of binding to androgen receptors in skeletal muscle and prostate, as well as to sex hormone-binding globulin." *Endocrinology* 114(6):2100-2106. PMID: 6539197.
Foundational AR + SHBG binding affinities.
View StudyRasmussen JJ et al. (2016). "Former Abusers of Anabolic Androgenic Steroids Exhibit Decreased Testosterone Levels and Hypogonadal Symptoms Years after Cessation." *PLoS One* 11(8):e0161208. PMID: 27536957.
Anchor for SKIP-AT-20 logic.
View StudyBaggish AL et al. (2017). "Cardiovascular toxicity of illicit anabolic-androgenic steroid use." *Circulation* 135(21):1991-2002. PMID: 28533317.
Cardiac MRI cohort; AAS-class CV risk.
View StudyPope HG Jr et al. (2014). "Adverse health consequences of performance-enhancing drugs: an Endocrine Society scientific statement." *Endocrine Reviews* 35(3):341-375. PMID: 24423981.
Endocrine Society AAS adverse-effect review.
View StudyStatPearls — Biochemistry, Dihydrotestosterone (NBK557634)
Teaching-grade reference.
View SourceHow was your experience with this compound?
Anonymous · one vote per session · results below at 5+ votes.
See something off?
Most of this wiki is AI-generated. Suggest a correction, dosing update, or new evidence — we review every submission.