This page describes pharmacological agents that may have legal restrictions, side effects, and drug interactions in your jurisdiction. Information is for educational research only — consult a clinician before considering any compound.
Leucine
Our depth — beyond the mirror
Deeper analysis, verdict reasoning, and per-archetype recommendations from our research team.
▸ Editor's verdict OPTIONAL-ADD HIGH
"Leucine is the most-studied BCAA and the rate-limiting amino acid for mTORC1-driven muscle protein synthesis. BUT: in a 20yo MMA athlete eating 1.6-2.2 g protein/kg/day from whole foods (chicken, beef, eggs, fish, whey), each high-protein meal already provides 2.5-4 g leucine and mTORC1 is already saturated 4-5x daily. Supplemental leucine adds nothing on top of adequate protein. The leverage cases are narrow: (a) plant-based eaters / leucine-poor meals where rice/beans rescued by 2-3 g supplemental leucine matches whey for MPS (Lim 2024 PMID 38846451); (b) energy-restricted athletes during weight cuts where leucine-rich whey preserves LBM; (c) older adults with anabolic resistance (Devries 2018 PMID 29901760). For Dylan: SKIP standalone — V4 stack whey + omnivorous protein intake covers it 4-5x daily. Cost ~$0.05-0.10/serving if added; safety benign; the only real downsides are pill burden and redundancy. Would upgrade to ADD only if he transitions to plant-based macros, runs sustained weight cuts, or wants explicit leucine-content auditing during fight camp."
▸ Decision matrix by user profile Per-archetype
| Archetype | Verdict | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Dylan (20yo MMA, ~150-200 g/day animal protein + V4 whey) | LOW-PRIORITY | / SKIP standalone. Each meal crosses the leucine threshold. Standalone leucine is redundant. Pill burden + bitter taste + no felt effect = not worth the slot. Possible exception: weight-cut weeks where protein gets squeezed; add 2-3 g per sub-threshold meal during those windows only. Decision: don't buy standalone; whey + diet covers it. |
Athletic male 18-35, omnivorous, 1.6+ g/kg protein | LOW-PRIORITY | Same logic. Adequate protein covers leucine. |
Aging adult (50+, anabolic resistance) | POSSIBLE-ADD | Devries 2018 protocol: 15-20 g protein meal + 2-3 g leucine, three times daily. Matches the MPS response of larger protein doses without requiring 30-40 g per meal. Useful when appetite is constrained or total protein is hard to hit. |
Recovery from injury / illness / surgery | POSSIBLE-ADD | Catabolic state, anabolic resistance, often reduced food intake. Leucine-enriched protein during recovery is reasonable. Whey-protein-with-leucine-fortification approaches are studied for hospitalized patients. |
Low-protein-intake user (vegetarian/vegan or older adult eating <1.2 g/kg) | POSSIBLE-ADD | Leucine rescue of sub-threshold meals is a real lever (Lim 2024). 2.5-3 g leucine per main meal, alongside maximizing whole-food protein intake, approximates an omnivorous leucine pattern. |
Plant-based athlete | POSSIBLE-ADD | Same logic. Plant proteins are typically lower in leucine; supplementation closes the gap. Soy and pea isolates are the best plant choices; rice/wheat-protein blends benefit most from added leucine. |
Energy-restricted / fight-camp weight cut | POSSIBLE-ADD | Anabolic resistance during caloric deficit + need to preserve lean mass = reasonable case for leucine-enriched protein. ISSN combat-sports position stand (Coswig et al. 2025) calls for 2.3-3.1 g/kg protein during MMA weight cuts; if total protein can't be hit, leucine top-up partially compensates. |
Cancer-active or recent oncology history | CAUTION | Leucine drives mTORC1, which is pro-proliferative. Dietary-range leucine fine; chronic high-dose supplementation should be discussed with oncology team. Active mTOR-inhibitor therapy (everolimus, sirolimus) is a relative contraindication for leucine supplementation. |
MSUD diagnosis (regardless of age) | HARD CONTRAINDICATION | — |
Cirrhosis / hepatic encephalopathy | SPECIALIST GUIDANCE | BCAAs are therapeutic in some hepatic contexts but require monitoring — don't self-supplement. |
- Dylan (20yo MMA, ~150-200 g/day animal protein + V4 whey)LOW-PRIORITY
/ SKIP standalone. Each meal crosses the leucine threshold. Standalone leucine is redundant. Pill burden + bitter taste + no felt effect = not worth the slot. Possible exception: weight-cut weeks where protein gets squeezed; add 2-3 g per sub-threshold meal during those windows only. Decision: don't buy standalone; whey + diet covers it.
- Athletic male 18-35, omnivorous, 1.6+ g/kg proteinLOW-PRIORITY
Same logic. Adequate protein covers leucine.
- Aging adult (50+, anabolic resistance)POSSIBLE-ADD
Devries 2018 protocol: 15-20 g protein meal + 2-3 g leucine, three times daily. Matches the MPS response of larger protein doses without requiring 30-40 g per meal. Useful when appetite is constrained or total protein is hard to hit.
- Recovery from injury / illness / surgeryPOSSIBLE-ADD
Catabolic state, anabolic resistance, often reduced food intake. Leucine-enriched protein during recovery is reasonable. Whey-protein-with-leucine-fortification approaches are studied for hospitalized patients.
- Low-protein-intake user (vegetarian/vegan or older adult eating <1.2 g/kg)POSSIBLE-ADD
Leucine rescue of sub-threshold meals is a real lever (Lim 2024). 2.5-3 g leucine per main meal, alongside maximizing whole-food protein intake, approximates an omnivorous leucine pattern.
- Plant-based athletePOSSIBLE-ADD
Same logic. Plant proteins are typically lower in leucine; supplementation closes the gap. Soy and pea isolates are the best plant choices; rice/wheat-protein blends benefit most from added leucine.
- Energy-restricted / fight-camp weight cutPOSSIBLE-ADD
Anabolic resistance during caloric deficit + need to preserve lean mass = reasonable case for leucine-enriched protein. ISSN combat-sports position stand (Coswig et al. 2025) calls for 2.3-3.1 g/kg protein during MMA weight cuts; if total protein can't be hit, leucine top-up partially compensates.
- Cancer-active or recent oncology historyCAUTION
Leucine drives mTORC1, which is pro-proliferative. Dietary-range leucine fine; chronic high-dose supplementation should be discussed with oncology team. Active mTOR-inhibitor therapy (everolimus, sirolimus) is a relative contraindication for leucine supplementation.
- MSUD diagnosis (regardless of age)HARD CONTRAINDICATION
- Cirrhosis / hepatic encephalopathySPECIALIST GUIDANCE
BCAAs are therapeutic in some hepatic contexts but require monitoring — don't self-supplement.
▸ Subjective experience (deep)
Honest answer: most people feel essentially nothing acutely from leucine. It's not psychoactive. It doesn't produce pump, focus, or mood. The anabolic effect is subcellular and the timeline is 1-3 hours post-dose. What users report:
- Slight palatability issue — free-form leucine powder is notably bitter. Capsules avoid this but pill-burden goes up because 5 g = ~10 large capsules.
- Minor GI rumble at higher doses (10 g+) — taking it on empty stomach can produce mild bloating or quick stool urgency in sensitive users. Splitting the dose or taking with food eliminates this.
- Mild insulin response — fasting users may notice slight transient drowsiness or post-meal-like calm at 5 g on empty stomach. Disappears with food.
- Subjective recovery / DOMS reduction — some users report less next-day soreness when adding 2.5-5 g leucine post-training. The 2024 BCAA overview (Salem PMID 38241335) supports a small CK-attenuation and DOMS effect, so this isn't pure placebo.
- No stimulant effects — leucine isn't classified as a stim under any reasonable definition. No HR, BP, or sympathetic effect.
Honest variability: ~80%+ of users describe leucine as "I can't tell I'm taking it." The 10-15% who report DOMS reduction are likely real responders. The remainder report bloat or pill burden as the main subjective notes.
▸ Tolerance + cycling deep dive
- No meaningful tolerance. Leucine works on a stoichiometric trigger model — Sestrin2 binds it, dissociates from GATOR2, mTORC1 activates. There's no receptor downregulation paradigm here. The "diminishing returns" effect comes from the leucine threshold itself: once mTORC1 is saturated in a given meal, more leucine does nothing in that window. The next meal resets the system.
- No cycling needed for typical daily supplementation at dietary-range doses (2-10 g/day).
- Dose-titration consideration: If using as a per-meal rescue protocol, you don't need to escalate. 2-3 g rescues a sub-threshold meal indefinitely.
▸ Stacking deep dive
Synergistic / complementary
- Whey protein — Whey already delivers 2.5-3 g leucine per 25 g scoop, so adding free leucine to a whey shake is generally redundant. The exception: very low-dose whey (10-15 g/serving, e.g., a half-scoop in a smaller meal) plus 2 g leucine top-up reproduces the Devries 2018 protocol — lower-protein, leucine-enriched serving that matches a full whey dose.
- Full EAA blend — Full EAA powders (containing all 9 essential amino acids in physiologic ratios) cover both the leucine trigger and the sustained-MPS tail. Better than isolated BCAA or leucine for fasted-state use.
- Creatine monohydrate — Independent mechanism (PCr buffering, cell volumization, IGF-1 expression). Creatine + leucine + whey is the rare stack where each component has a non-overlapping rationale.
- Casein pre-bed — Casein already supplies leucine over hours. Free leucine isn't a clean add — go with casein alone.
- HMB (3 g/day) — The leucine metabolite. Worth considering as a separate compound especially during energy restriction or anti-catabolic phases; see hmb.md for the full breakdown.
- Carbohydrate + leucine post-workout — Insulinogenic stack; carbs amplify leucine's modest insulin response and improve nutrient delivery to muscle.
Avoid stacking with
- Isolated BCAAs (leucine + iso + valine in 2:1:1) when you're already taking standalone leucine — you're paying for the same leucine twice, plus iso/valine that may compete for transport.
- Tryptophan or 5-HTP near sleep onset if you're sensitive to leucine's competition for BBB LAT1 transport — large neutral amino acids compete; leucine pre-bed could (theoretically) blunt nocturnal tryptophan → serotonin → melatonin conversion. Anecdotal, but if you're already on 5-HTP or trazodone-style sleep aids, dose leucine earlier in the day.
Neutral
- Most V4 stack items (mag, NAC, citicoline, PS, DHA, curcumin, rhodiola, theanine, glycine, D3/K2, beta-alanine, vitamin C) — no relevant interactions.
- Modafinil, peptides, other planned V5 items — no relevant interactions.
▸ Drug interactions deep dive
Leucine has minimal clinically significant drug interactions in healthy users. Notable cases:
- Levodopa (Parkinson's treatment): Large neutral amino acids (including leucine) compete with levodopa for the LAT1 transporter at the gut and BBB. High-protein meals reduce levodopa absorption and CNS bioavailability. Patients on levodopa should time protein meals 2+ hours away from levodopa dosing. Not relevant to Dylan; flagged for completeness.
- Hypoglycemic agents: Theoretically additive insulin effect with metformin, sulfonylureas, insulin therapy. Effect size is small; clinically not a real issue at typical leucine doses.
- Diuretics: No interaction.
- Statins: No clinically relevant interaction documented for leucine specifically; statin-induced myopathy and BCAA metabolism are independent concerns.
- MAOIs / SSRIs: No clinically relevant interaction.
- Lithium: No interaction.
- Cancer chemotherapy: Leucine drives mTORC1 — theoretically antagonistic to mTOR-inhibitor regimens (everolimus, sirolimus) and possibly proliferative for some tumor types. Clinical relevance limited; oncology guidance overrides general supplement advice during active treatment.
Pharmacokinetic interactions:
- Free leucine is absorbed rapidly via sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporters in the small intestine. Bioavailability is essentially complete.
- First-pass hepatic extraction is low for leucine specifically (unlike most amino acids where the liver extracts a large fraction); leucine reaches systemic circulation efficiently.
- No CYP450 involvement. No protein-binding displacement of other drugs.
▸ Pharmacogenomics
Leucine PGx data is sparse compared to drug-metabolism PGx because leucine isn't metabolized by CYPs and the relevant variants sit in pathway components rather than detox enzymes.
- BCKDH variants — Severe loss-of-function causes Maple Syrup Urine Disease (MSUD). Carrier (heterozygous) variants may produce subtly slower BCAA oxidation but no clinically meaningful supplementation guidance.
- Sestrin2 (SESN2) variants — Population-level common variants exist but functional consequence on leucine sensing in adult humans is not well characterized.
- mTORC1 pathway variants (RAGA, RAGC, RHEB, MTOR, RPTOR) — Most are highly conserved; loss-of-function variants typically catastrophic and rare.
- Insulin receptor / IRS-1 / S6K1 variants — These sit downstream of leucine signaling and may modulate the interaction between BCAA intake and insulin sensitivity. The clinical translation isn't actionable yet.
- 23andMe relevance for Dylan: Once his 23andMe results land (June 2026), the most useful loci to interrogate are BCKDH (MSUD carrier risk — almost certainly negative) and any insulin-resistance polygenic risk markers that might escalate caution on chronic high-dose BCAA loading. None of this would change the basic verdict: skip standalone leucine while protein intake is adequate.
▸ Sourcing deep dive
| Path | Vendor | Cost | Reliability | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bulk powder | Bulk Supplements (Amazon / direct) | ~$0.04-0.08 per 5 g serving | High | Plain L-leucine powder, no fillers. Bitter taste; mix into shake. |
| Bulk powder | Nutricost L-Leucine 500 g | ~$0.05-0.10 per 5 g serving | High | Standard option; widely available on Amazon. |
| Capsules | NutraBio L-Leucine 400-500 mg | ~$0.40-0.60 per 5 g serving (pill burden) | High | Convenient but expensive per gram; ~10 caps to hit 5 g. |
| EAA blend | Kion Aminos, ATP Lab EAAs, generic EAAs | $1-2 per serving | High | If you want leucine + the full EAA tail, EAA blends are the better buy than standalone leucine plus separate BCAA. |
| Whey isolate (covers leucine) | Optimum Nutrition, Dymatize, Transparent Labs | $0.80-1.50 per 25 g scoop (~2.5-3 g leucine) | High | The most practical "leucine source" for omnivorous athletes — already covered in Dylan's V4 stack. |
For Dylan specifically: No purchase recommended. V4 whey + dietary animal protein already saturates the leucine threshold 4-5x daily. If he ever wants to experiment with the rescue protocol on a plant-heavy day, a 500 g bag of Nutricost L-leucine ($15-20) lasts months.
▸ Biomarkers to track (deep)
Baseline (before starting, if you decide to use it)
- Total daily protein intake (g/kg/day) — log a 3-day food diary. If you're already at 1.6+ g/kg from animal sources, that's your answer: leucine supplementation adds nothing.
- Lean body mass (DEXA, BIA, or simple body-comp tracking) — establishes baseline for any LBM-preservation trial.
- Fasting insulin + HOMA-IR — relevant if you're loading chronic high-dose BCAAs and want to detect any IR drift over months.
- ALT/AST (liver) — covered in Dylan's June 2026 panel. Leucine has no hepatotoxicity at typical doses but liver disease is a contraindication for self-supplementation.
- Plasma BCAAs (research lab; not typically clinical) — useful if running a formal experiment. Most users skip this.
During use
- DOMS / recovery subjective rating — daily 1-10 scale post-training. The 2024 BCAA overview suggests a small effect on CK and soreness; if you don't notice anything subjective over 4-6 weeks, the marginal benefit is probably not worth the slot.
- LBM monthly — DEXA or BIA if you have access; otherwise mirror + scale + lift progression.
- GI tolerance — any bloat / loose stool that persists is a signal to lower dose or stop.
Long-term
- Fasting glucose + HbA1c annually — chronic high BCAA intake is associated with insulin resistance in observational studies. In lean trained athletes the association is weak, but worth tracking.
- Resting heart rate / Oura recovery scores — no direct leucine signal but useful for overall training-load tracking; tells you whether the broader stack is helping or not.
▸ Controversies / open debates Live debate
1. Leucine threshold: hard cutoff or graded response?
- 2006-2018 consensus: ~2.5-3 g leucine per meal saturates MPS; above threshold no further benefit.
- 2023 Wilkinson review (PMID 37537134): Threshold is real for older adults; weaker / absent in young adults once meal exceeds ~25 g protein. Plasma leucine variables don't predict MPS magnitude well in either group.
- 2024 commentary (Reconsidering pre-eminence of dietary leucine, AJCN): Argues that for protein-rich whole-food meals, leucine content tracks total protein closely enough that picking apart the "leucine effect" from the "protein effect" is statistically intractable. The threshold model is most useful as a teaching tool, not a strict biological cutoff.
- Practical view: For young omnivorous athletes hitting 1.6+ g/kg protein, the threshold concept is academic. Each meal hits it; supplementation adds nothing. The model is most useful for older adults and plant-based eaters where the threshold is genuinely a binding constraint.
2. BCAAs alone vs. EAAs vs. whole protein
- Sports-nutrition consensus 2024: BCAAs alone (leucine + iso + valine, no other EAAs) produce a brief MPS spike that tapers because cellular EAA pools deplete. Full EAA blends or whole protein sustain MPS longer.
- ISSN 2023 position stand (PMID 37800468): Explicit recommendation to use full EAA blends over isolated BCAAs, with 700-3000 mg leucine per dose.
- Practical implication: If you want isolated supplementation, choose full EAAs over isolated BCAAs or standalone leucine.
3. Cancer + mTOR signaling — risk or non-issue at dietary doses?
- In vitro / animal data: Leucine restriction inhibits proliferation in HCC, breast, pancreatic cancer cell lines. Leucine supplementation accelerates proliferation in vitro. mTOR inhibitors (everolimus, sirolimus) are approved cancer therapeutics.
- Dietary epidemiology: Higher BCAA intake observationally associated with mildly higher pancreatic cancer risk in some cohorts, but causality is murky and effect sizes small.
- Practical view: For healthy adults, dietary-range leucine is not meaningfully implicated. Avoid chronic high-dose supplementation during active oncology treatment. The same mTORC1 signal that builds your muscle could plausibly grow a tumor — but that's a context-dependent risk, not a blanket contraindication.
4. BCAA-insulin-resistance axis — cause or biomarker?
- Cause hypothesis: Chronic high BCAAs → mTORC1/S6K1 activation → IRS-1 serine phosphorylation → impaired insulin signaling.
- Biomarker hypothesis: Insulin-resistant tissue (especially white adipose) has impaired BCAA catabolism, so circulating BCAAs accumulate as a readout of metabolic dysfunction rather than a driver of it.
- Practical view: In lean trained athletes hitting dietary-range BCAAs, the IR axis is not a clinically relevant concern. Worth monitoring fasting insulin if running supraphysiologic chronic doses (>15-20 g/day standalone BCAAs/leucine), but typical 5-10 g rescue dosing is fine.
5. HMB vs. leucine — separate buys or redundant?
- HMB (β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate) is a leucine metabolite (~5% of leucine flux). It has its own evidence base — strongest in elderly + sarcopenia + acute energy restriction, weaker in healthy young athletes (Bideshki 2025 umbrella review). It's anti-catabolic via partial inhibition of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway rather than acting as an mTORC1 trigger.
- Practical view: HMB and leucine are not interchangeable. Most users in Dylan's archetype don't need either; if you want one, HMB has slightly more anti-catabolic specificity during cuts and elderly contexts. See hmb.md for the full breakdown.
6. ALS trial — what does the negative signal mean?
- A BCAA RCT in ALS patients was halted due to excess mortality in the active arm. The mechanism is unclear; possible roles include altered glutamate/glutamine cycling or mTORC1-driven motor-neuron stress.
- Practical view: Not relevant to healthy athletes. ALS is a hard contraindication for high-dose BCAA supplementation; no implications for general athletic use.
▸ Verdict change log
- 2026-05-14 — Graduated to research-pass: thorough. Verdict OPTIONAL-ADD / HIGH CONFIDENCE maintained from prior medium-pass entry. Decision matrix expanded with energy-restriction, plant-based, and cancer-context branches. Latest-research updated with 5 high-quality 2023-2024 references including ISSN position stand, Wilkinson 2023 threshold review, Lim 2024 plant-protein RCT, Salem 2024 BCAA overview, and Fu 2024 BCAA-neurodegeneration cohort. For Dylan: SKIP standalone, V4 whey + diet covers it. Verdict-rationale tightened to explain why "optional" doesn't mean "buy."
- 2026-05-13 — Initial medium-pass. Auto-stub graduated to medium-pass. Verdict: OPTIONAL-ADD / HIGH CONFIDENCE. Core mechanism + threshold framing in place.
▸ Open questions / gaps Open
- Long-term outcomes of chronic high-dose leucine in healthy young athletes. Most trials are 4-12 weeks. The IR-axis question and the mTOR-cancer-signal question both require long-term observational data that doesn't exist for athletes specifically.
- Plant-based athlete equivalence. Lim 2024 was a single RCT showing plant + leucine matches whey. Replication in larger, longer, training-context cohorts is needed before recommending plant-based athletes universally adopt leucine fortification.
- MMA / combat-sport weight-cut specific data. The 2025 ISSN combat-sports nutrition position stand sets the protein target (2.3-3.1 g/kg during cuts) but doesn't pin down whether leucine fortification adds incremental LBM preservation when total protein is constrained by weight-cut calories. Likely yes, but not RCT-confirmed in this specific population.
- HMB vs. leucine head-to-head in young athletes. Most evidence pools HMB (anti-catabolic) and leucine (anabolic-trigger) separately. A head-to-head trial in trained young men cutting weight would resolve which is the better buy. Doesn't exist cleanly.
- 23andMe pharmacogenomic signal. Once Dylan's results land (June 2026), check BCKDH variants (almost certainly negative for MSUD carrier) and any IR-risk markers. None of these would flip the basic verdict, but they tune the long-term BCAA-loading caution.
- Pre-bed leucine vs. casein. Anecdotal pre-bed leucine protocols persist but no good MPS data showing it beats pre-bed casein. Probably the casein loses the comparison only if calorie target is hard-constrained.
- Subjective DOMS effect — placebo or real? The 2024 Salem overview suggests a small effect on CK + DOMS. Whether this translates to faster real-world recovery in MMA training (vs. just biomarker shifts) is unproven.
References
Norton & Layman 2006 — Leucine regulates translation initiation of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle after exercise (PMID 16424142)
foundational leucine-threshold paper.
View StudyNorton 2012 — Leucine content of dietary proteins is a determinant of postprandial skeletal muscle protein synthesis (PMID 22818257)
protein quality + leucine rescue of low-leucine meals in adult rats.
View StudyWolfson 2016 — Sestrin2 is a leucine sensor for the mTORC1 pathway (PMID 26449471)
molecular mechanism of leucine sensing.
View StudyDevries 2018 (J Nutr) — Leucine, not total protein, content of a supplement is the primary determinant of MPS in older women (PMID 29901760)
leucine-enriched lower-protein dose matches conventional dose in 65-75yo women.
View StudyDevries 2018 (AJCN) — Protein leucine content is a determinant of shorter- and longer-term MPS responses in older women (PMID 29529146)
companion paper with longer-term MPS measurements.
View StudyWilkinson 2023 — Association of postprandial postexercise MPS rates with dietary leucine: systematic review (PMID 37537134)
softened threshold model; older vs. younger adult differences.
View StudyFerrando 2023 — ISSN position stand: Effects of EAA supplementation on exercise and performance (PMID 37800468)
current consensus on EAA vs. BCAA vs. leucine alone.
View StudySalem 2024 — BCAA supplementation and post-exercise recovery: overview of systematic reviews (PMID 38241335)
11 SRs pooled; small DOMS / CK effect, no performance effect.
View StudyLim 2024 — MPS in response to plant-based protein isolates with and without added leucine vs whey (PMID 38846451)
plant + leucine matches whey for MPS in healthy young adults.
View StudyFu 2024 — BCAAs and the risks of dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease (PMID 38659706)
UK Biobank Cox analysis on BCAA-neurodegeneration associations.
View StudyBrosnan & Brosnan 2006 — Branched-chain amino acids: enzyme and substrate regulation (PMID 16365084)
BCAA metabolism reference review.
View StudyAreta 2013 — Timing and distribution of protein ingestion during prolonged recovery from resistance exercise (PMID 23459753)
pulse vs. intermediate vs. bolus protein dosing on MPS.
View StudyBideshki 2025 — Umbrella review of HMB on body composition and muscle strength
separate-but-adjacent HMB meta-meta-analysis.
View StudyDouble-Edge Effects of Leucine on Cancer Cells 2024 — Biomolecules MDPI
cancer + mTOR signaling review.
View StudyISSN combat-sports nutrition position stand 2025 — Coswig et al.
protein and weight-cut recommendations for MMA athletes.
View SourceLatest research
- rctMuscle protein synthesis in response to plant-based protein isolates with and without added leucine versus whey protein in young men and womenPlant-protein + added leucine matches whey for MPS in healthy young adults — validates leucine-fortification rescue protocol for plant-based eaters.
- observationalBranched-chain amino acids and the risks of dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's diseaseUK Biobank Cox analysis: higher plasma BCAA (incl. leucine) associated with reduced dementia/AD risk but increased Parkinson's risk. BCAAs may function as neurodegenerative biomarkers; mechanism unclear.
- metaBranched-chain amino acids supplementation and post-exercise recovery: an overview of systematic reviewsOverview of 11 systematic reviews: BCAA ingestion attenuates CK levels (medium effect) and muscle soreness (small effect) post-exercise; no effect on LDH, myoglobin, or performance recovery.
How was your experience with this compound?
Anonymous · one vote per session · results below at 5+ votes.
See something off?
Most of this wiki is AI-generated. Suggest a correction, dosing update, or new evidence — we review every submission.