This page describes pharmacological agents that may have legal restrictions, side effects, and drug interactions in your jurisdiction. Information is for educational research only — consult a clinician before considering any compound.
Primobolan (Methenolone)
Surface here is educational only; do not use without medical supervision. Our editorial verdict is SKIP-FOR-NOW — current cost / risk / redundancy puts it below the line.
Our depth — beyond the mirror
Deeper analysis, verdict reasoning, and per-archetype recommendations from our research team.
▸ Editor's verdict SKIP-FOR-NOW HIGH
For this-archetype (20yo MMA athlete + business owner, 185-190 lb, peak natural T, brain-priority, no stated aesthetic / mass goals) — methenolone is a SKIP-AT-20 by the same family logic that rules out testosterone-enanthate, boldenone, and the rest of the AAS class. (a) HPG-axis suppression at 20 risks long-term shutdown of an axis still consolidating its mature setpoint — Rasmussen 2016 (J Clin Endocrinol Metab) documented persistent hypogonadism years after AAS withdrawal in a sub-population, and the risk concentrates in younger users with extended cycles. (b) WADA S1.1a-prohibited at all times — for an MMA athlete who may compete in any tested promotion (USADA / VADA / state commissions), this is a career-ending positive. Methenolone's long-term sulfate metabolites are detectable >30 days post-cycle per Albertsdóttir 2020. (c) Counterfeit problem is severe — methenolone API costs roughly 5-10× testosterone per gram, and published mass-spec analyses (Magnolato 2017, Coopman 2022 PMC9288681) find 42-67% of seized "primobolan" is actually substituted with cheaper compounds (testosterone, nandrolone, boldenone). The user pays primobolan prices to inject something else, with no way to verify without third-party lab analysis. (d) The "mild and safe" reputation is overstated — methenolone still suppresses LH/FSH at 400+ mg/week, still raises hematocrit, still negatively shifts lipid panel (HDL drops, LDL/ApoB rises), and at 600+ mg/week the side-effect profile converges with other AAS. The relative-mildness is real but 20 isn't the age to be running ANY AAS. HIGH (not MEDIUM) confidence because there is no plausible 20yo MMA athlete + business owner reframe that flips this verdict — even competitive cutting goals are better served by 12 weeks of dietary discipline than by a Schedule III androgen with a 30+ day detection window. Would change verdict only if user reaches 30+, has aged out of competitive MMA, has documented HPG checkpoint completed, has non-tested aesthetic / hormone-replacement context, and chooses methenolone over more cost-effective AAS specifically for the female-friendly or low-aromatization profile (which doesn't apply to a male user).
▸ Decision matrix by user profile Per-archetype
| Archetype | Verdict | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
20yo MMA athlete + business owner (this-archetype) | SKIP-AT- | WADA-banned with >30-day detection windows is a career-ending positive risk for any tested promotion. HPG suppression at 20 risks long-term axis shutdown. Counterfeit market means the user statistically pays methenolone prices for substituted testosterone or nandrolone. No aesthetic / mass goal in this archetype is worth the regulatory + biological risk. Free behavioral lever (training discipline + nutrition periodization) achieves any "lean-mass" goal without the Schedule III androgen overhead. |
25-30, advanced AAS user, non-tested, with TRT base, lean-physique goal | OPTIONAL-ADD | Methenolone has a defensible value proposition for this sub-population — clean cutting-cycle add-on with low-virilization profile and no aromatization. Cost-effectiveness is the main critique; testosterone + masteron stack delivers similar end-result at substantially lower cost. |
Adult female (25+), advanced AAS literacy, lean-physique goal, non-tested | NARROW-LEGITIMATE-USE | Methenolone has the most-defensible female AAS profile in the class — lowest virilization incidence at typical female doses (25-50 mg/day oral acetate × 6-8 weeks). Still carries virilization risk; some changes permanent. Other AAS (anavar) compete for this niche with slightly less consensus on long-term safety. |
30-50, executive maintenance / TRT-replacement only | SKIP | for non-medical use. Standard testosterone-replacement covers the legitimate medical need; adding methenolone introduces stacking risk without clear benefit. |
Tested athlete (any tier, any sport) | HARD SKIP | Detection windows >30 days post-cycle make this incompatible with competitive testing. |
Beginner AAS user | SKIP | Counterfeit market means beginners cannot verify product identity; methenolone is a sophisticated user's compound, not a starter AAS. |
Anemia / aplastic anemia (clinical context) | CLINICAL-USE-ONLY | Historic B-tier evidence supports methenolone in refractory anemia under hematologist supervision. Modern oncology / hematology has largely moved to other agents (recombinant EPO, immunosuppressive therapy, transplant). |
- 20yo MMA athlete + business owner (this-archetype)SKIP-AT-
WADA-banned with >30-day detection windows is a career-ending positive risk for any tested promotion. HPG suppression at 20 risks long-term axis shutdown. Counterfeit market means the user statistically pays methenolone prices for substituted testosterone or nandrolone. No aesthetic / mass goal in this archetype is worth the regulatory + biological risk. Free behavioral lever (training discipline + nutrition periodization) achieves any "lean-mass" goal without the Schedule III androgen overhead.
- 25-30, advanced AAS user, non-tested, with TRT base, lean-physique goalOPTIONAL-ADD
Methenolone has a defensible value proposition for this sub-population — clean cutting-cycle add-on with low-virilization profile and no aromatization. Cost-effectiveness is the main critique; testosterone + masteron stack delivers similar end-result at substantially lower cost.
- Adult female (25+), advanced AAS literacy, lean-physique goal, non-testedNARROW-LEGITIMATE-USE
Methenolone has the most-defensible female AAS profile in the class — lowest virilization incidence at typical female doses (25-50 mg/day oral acetate × 6-8 weeks). Still carries virilization risk; some changes permanent. Other AAS (anavar) compete for this niche with slightly less consensus on long-term safety.
- 30-50, executive maintenance / TRT-replacement onlySKIP
for non-medical use. Standard testosterone-replacement covers the legitimate medical need; adding methenolone introduces stacking risk without clear benefit.
- Tested athlete (any tier, any sport)HARD SKIP
Detection windows >30 days post-cycle make this incompatible with competitive testing.
- Beginner AAS userSKIP
Counterfeit market means beginners cannot verify product identity; methenolone is a sophisticated user's compound, not a starter AAS.
- Anemia / aplastic anemia (clinical context)CLINICAL-USE-ONLY
Historic B-tier evidence supports methenolone in refractory anemia under hematologist supervision. Modern oncology / hematology has largely moved to other agents (recombinant EPO, immunosuppressive therapy, transplant).
▸ Subjective experience (deep)
Per typical bodybuilding community reports at off-label physique doses (400-700 mg/week injectable enanthate or 50-100 mg/day oral acetate, paired with TRT-dose testosterone base):
- Onset: Slow. Long ester (enanthate) requires 2-3 weeks of twice-weekly injection to reach steady-state. Subjective effects emerge week 3-5 — modest improvement in muscle hardness, slight increase in vascularity in already-lean users (high body fat masks the effect entirely).
- Peak effect: Weeks 6-10. Lean-mass gain modest — typically 5-12 lb across a 12-week cycle even at 600 mg/week, vs 15-25 lb on equivalent test+tren stack. Strength uptick <5% above natural baseline for most users. Body-composition shift (lower water retention, harder muscle look) is the value proposition, not raw mass.
- Subjective "feel": Methenolone is famously "quiet." Unlike testosterone (libido boost, mood lift, aggression ramp) or trenbolone (insomnia, sweats, irritability, brutal subjective intensity), methenolone-only users often report "I don't feel anything different except looking slightly leaner." This is part of why it gets stacked with testosterone — to add the "feel" component.
- Libido / mood: Mild positive shift on cycle for some, neutral for most. The lack of aromatization means no estradiol boost (which testosterone provides for libido) — methenolone-only cycles can paradoxically tank libido even while raising AR signaling, because estradiol is itself important for male sexual function.
- Side-effect intensity: Mild relative to other AAS. Some users report mild oily skin / minor acne breakthrough. Minimal hair loss intensity at typical doses (lower than testosterone or DHT itself per anecdote, despite the DHT-derivation — the 1-methyl group apparently dampens scalp 5αR conversion product activity).
- Off-cycle: HPG recovery typically 4-12 weeks for first or second cycle users with proper PCT (tamoxifen / clomiphene 4 weeks). Longer with stacked or extended-duration use. Persistent hypogonadism risk concentrates in users with multiple cycles + extended duration + age <25 at first cycle.
Reality check: The "mild and clean" reputation is partially placebo-shielded. Methenolone is famous for being mild, so users often interpret a quiet cycle as success. The objective signal (lab work — total T crash mid-cycle, hematocrit creep, lipid panel shift) usually shows the cycle was doing more than the subjective experience suggested.
▸ Tolerance + cycling deep dive
- Tolerance buildup: AR-mediated effects show modest tolerance on extended cycles — receptor downregulation in target tissues. Most users stack-rotate or cycle off rather than escalate dose.
- Recommended cycle: 8-14 weeks on, equal time off (12+ weeks washout) is the conservative pattern. Aggressive users run year-round on stacked AAS — this is the population that develops the long-term cardiomyopathy and hypogonadism documented in Pope / Kanayama / Rasmussen.
- Reset protocol: PCT after long methenolone enanthate cycles starts 2-3 weeks after final injection (long ester wash). Tamoxifen 20 mg/day × 4 weeks or clomiphene 50 mg/day × 4 weeks. HCG (250-500 IU 2× weekly) during cycle helps maintain testicular volume and ease PCT.
- Re-cycling: Repeated cycling compounds HPG-axis risk and cardiovascular risk. Each successive cycle increases the probability of incomplete recovery.
▸ Stacking deep dive
Synergistic with (in appropriate populations only — not this-archetype)
- Testosterone enanthate / cypionate (TRT base) — Standard "TRT base" companion to any AAS cycle including methenolone. Without testosterone base at 200-300 mg/week, methenolone-only cycles deliver paradoxically poor libido and energy because estradiol crashes (no aromatization from methenolone, no aromatization from suppressed endogenous testosterone). Test base prevents this.
- Anavar (oxandrolone) — Both mild AAS, both low aromatization. Stack creates a "lean-mass-only" pre-contest profile. Hepatotoxicity stacking concern exists because oxandrolone is 17αα — methenolone-acetate's 1-methylation doesn't add to oxandrolone's liver burden, so the stack is liver-safer than two 17αα orals together.
- Masteron (drostanolone) — Both DHT-derivatives, both non-aromatizing. Functional duplication risk — both compounds drive similar AR signaling profile. Stacked in pre-contest for additive AR effect at lower per-compound dose.
- Boldenone (Equipoise) — "Quality lean" stacking partner — both mild AAS, both non-alkylated (boldenone is testosterone-derivative with 1-double bond, not DHT-derivative), both relatively HPG-friendly within class. Common 12-16 week stack.
- HCG (250-500 IU 2× weekly during cycle) — Maintains testicular volume / responsiveness; eases PCT.
Avoid stacking with
- Trenbolone — Trenbolone's CNS / cardiovascular / lipid disturbance + HPTA-crushing effects are independent of and additive to methenolone's profile. Common in advanced bodybuilding stacks but not defensible from a risk-benefit perspective for non-competitive contexts.
- Multiple 17α-alkylated orals concurrently (dianabol + winstrol + anadrol) — methenolone acetate is itself oral but 1-methylated, not 17αα — adding multiple 17αα compounds escalates hepatotoxicity even though methenolone itself doesn't contribute much.
- Anticoagulants (warfarin, DOACs, daily aspirin) — AAS-class effect potentiates warfarin via albumin displacement and clotting-factor synthesis modulation. Methenolone label historically carried this warning.
- Insulin / oral hypoglycemics — AAS-class glucose tolerance shift; diabetic users may need dose adjustment.
Neutral / safe co-administration
- All of V4 (DHA, Magtein, Citicoline, NAC, PS, Mg Glycinate, Curcumin Phytosome, Rhodiola, L-Theanine, Glycine/L-Tryptophan, D3+K2, Beta-Alanine, Vit C, creatine).
- Modafinil, eugeroics, racetams, most CNS nootropics — different metabolic pathways.
- Vitamin D, omega-3 — omega-3 may partially offset the lipid disturbance.
- BPC-157, TB-500 — different mechanisms (peptide tissue repair), no known interaction with methenolone.
- Aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole) — only useful if testosterone base is part of stack; on methenolone-only cycles, AI is unnecessary and may over-suppress estradiol.
▸ Drug interactions deep dive
- Warfarin and other coumarin anticoagulants — methenolone (AAS-class effect) potentiates warfarin via albumin displacement and altered clotting-factor synthesis. Schering's historic Primobolan label carried this warning explicitly. INR monitoring required if co-administered.
- Insulin / oral hypoglycemics — AAS-class glucose-tolerance shift; diabetic patients may need dose adjustment.
- Corticosteroids — additive immunosuppressive / metabolic effects; not a direct interaction but co-administration warrants monitoring.
- CYP3A4 — methenolone metabolism is not heavily CYP3A4-dependent; minimal expected interaction with CYP3A4 inhibitors / inducers. Primary metabolism is via 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase pathways yielding the long-detected sulfate metabolites used in WADA testing.
- Hormonal contraceptives (female users) — AAS may alter contraceptive efficacy; backup method advisable during cycle.
▸ Pharmacogenomics
Minimal data specific to methenolone. Class-wide AAS pharmacogenomics:
- CAG-repeat length in androgen receptor (AR-CAG) — shorter CAG repeats correlate with greater AR sensitivity; users with short CAG-repeat alleles may experience more pronounced effects (and side effects) at given dose. 23andMe raw data carries this info but it's not surfaced in standard reports.
- 5α-reductase (SRD5A1, SRD5A2) variants — affect downstream DHT-pathway activation. Methenolone is already DHT-derivative, so 5αR variants are less relevant than they'd be for testosterone.
- CYP19A1 (aromatase) variants — irrelevant for methenolone (no aromatization), but matters if testosterone base is stacked.
- APOB / SORT1 / lipid genetics — modulate the magnitude of AAS-induced lipid disturbance. Users with adverse lipid genetics should expect proportionally larger HDL drop / LDL rise.
When user's 23andMe results land (~June 2026), no specific methenolone-relevant variants to look for beyond AR-CAG repeat (raw data) and APOB / lipid panel risk variants. Indirect: short AR-CAG might suggest larger response at lower dose, but not actionable for SKIP-AT-20 verdict.
▸ Sourcing deep dive
| Path | Vendor | Cost | Reliability | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharma-grade legitimate | Bayer Primobolan Depot (Spain / Turkey) | $80-150 per 1 mL/100 mg ampule | Medium-High when authentic — but counterfeit Bayer Primobolan ampules are themselves the most-faked AAS presentation on the market | Only legitimate pharmaceutical methenolone manufacture remaining in 2026. Spain (Schering-Plough España) and Turkey (Bayer Türk) supply. Holographic stamps, batch numbers, and pharmacy-channel verification are required. Most supply leaving these markets reaches consumers via gray-market routes. |
| UGL (underground lab) injectable | Various (Pharmacom, Beligas, Geneza, Dragon Pharma, Apoxar, etc.) | $90-150 per 10 mL/100 mg vial | Low-Medium without third-party COA | Methenolone API costs ~5-10× testosterone per gram; UGLs often substitute with testosterone, nandrolone, or boldenone to maintain profit margins. Per Coopman 2022 (PMC9288681): 42-67% of seized "primobolan" is counterfeit. Always require batch-specific COA from independent lab (Janoshik, AnabolicLab, SIMEC, AnaboliCheck). |
| UGL oral acetate | Various | $80-120 per 100 × 25 mg tablets | Low without third-party COA | Same counterfeit concerns as injectable. Tablet-form acetate is slightly easier to verify visually (proper compression, color, hardness) but ingredient identity still requires lab analysis. |
| Compounding pharmacy (US) | Effectively unavailable | N/A | N/A | Methenolone is Schedule III; no FDA-approved indication; not on 503A bulks list. Not a viable legal path in the US. |
| International pharmacy | Limited | $100-200/cycle | Medium | Some Eastern European, Turkish, or South American pharmacies dispense Bayer Primobolan Depot ampules with prescription. Importation to US is federally illegal. |
Verification protocol if a user did proceed (this user should not):
- Require batch-specific independent third-party COA showing HPLC purity ≥98%, GC-MS confirmation of methenolone identity (parent peak at correct m/z), and confirmation of stated ester (enanthate vs acetate vs other).
- Cross-check vendor reputation via PeptideRecon, AnabolicLab, MesoRx forums (with skepticism — vendor astroturfing is rampant).
- Visual check: pharma-grade injectable oil should be clear (light yellow to pale amber), no particulates, no cloudiness, no sedimentation.
- Price sanity check: anything priced at testosterone-tier ($40-60 per vial) is far more likely substituted than a "great deal."
- Optional: send a sample to AnabolicLab (USA) or Janoshik Analytical (EU) for independent quantitative analysis (~$50-90 per sample, 2-week turnaround).
Cost estimate for typical 12-week off-label male physique cycle (700 mg/week + TRT base): 8.4 g methenolone via UGL ~$400-600, plus testosterone base $50-100, plus AI / SERM PCT $50, plus optional HCG $100 = $600-850 cycle cost. Pharma-grade Bayer ampules would push this to $1500-2500. Compared to testosterone-only cycles at $100-200 total, methenolone is the most expensive AAS choice per cycle.
▸ Biomarkers to track (deep)
For users who proceed despite SKIP-AT-20 verdict (this user should not):
Pre-cycle baseline:
- Total + free testosterone, SHBG, LH, FSH — establish HPG baseline
- Estradiol (sensitive assay) — methenolone won't aromatize but testosterone base will
- Lipid panel (LDL-C, HDL-C, ApoB, oxLDL, triglycerides) — AAS class effect, expect adverse shift
- Hematocrit, hemoglobin, RBC count, ferritin — track polycythemia risk
- AST, ALT, GGT, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase — liver function (lower concern than 17αα orals but still monitor)
- Blood pressure — 24h ambulatory if available
- Creatinine, eGFR — kidney function baseline
- PSA (men >30) — prostate baseline
- Sperm analysis (if family-planning relevant) — quantify pre-cycle fertility for comparison
Mid-cycle (week 6-8):
- Total T (expect crash without test base), LH, FSH (expect suppression)
- Lipid panel (expect HDL drop, LDL/ApoB rise — magnitude is the actionable signal)
- Hematocrit (>54% triggers therapeutic phlebotomy decision)
- Liver enzymes (expect mild ALT/AST elevation, especially with oral acetate)
- Blood pressure
Post-cycle (week 4 of PCT, then week 12 from cycle end):
- Total + free T, LH, FSH (track HPG recovery — should return to baseline)
- Lipid panel (should normalize within 8-12 weeks of cessation)
- Hematocrit (should normalize within 6-12 weeks)
- Liver enzymes (should normalize within 4-8 weeks)
- Estradiol if testosterone base was stacked
- Sperm analysis at 12+ weeks if family-planning relevant
Annual (chronic users):
- Echocardiogram every 1-2 years (LV hypertrophy / cardiomyopathy screening — Pope / Kanayama AAS-cardiomyopathy literature)
- DEXA scan periodically (track lean-mass / fat-mass shifts objectively)
- Continued lipid + ApoB monitoring
▸ Controversies / open debates Live debate
"Mild and safe" reputation vs measured side-effect profile. Biohacker culture frames methenolone as the "safe AAS" — and at clinical doses (100-200 mg/week) the framing has merit. At physique doses (400-700 mg/week), methenolone delivers measurable HPG suppression, lipid disturbance, and hematocrit elevation — just less dramatically than testosterone or trenbolone. The mildness is real and relative; "safe" is overstated.
Female-friendly profile. Methenolone's reputation as the lowest-virilization AAS is grounded in the rat anabolic:androgenic ratio (88:44) and 50+ years of clinical and bodybuilding experience. It is genuinely the most-defensible female AAS choice within the class. The controversy: virilization-incidence at typical female doses is low but not zero, and some changes are permanent. The female-friendly framing is relative-to-the-class, not absolute-safe.
Counterfeit prevalence. Published mass-spec analyses (Magnolato 2017, Coopman 2022) document that 42-67% of seized "primobolan" is substituted with cheaper compounds. Vendor-side defenders argue these seizure samples skew toward bottom-tier UGL product and that "reputable" vendors deliver genuine methenolone. My read: the counterfeit problem is real and structural — methenolone API cost makes substitution economically rational at every level of the underground market. Without third-party batch-specific lab analysis, identity is unverifiable.
Oral vs injectable bioavailability. Methenolone acetate oral bioavailability is debated — published estimates range from <1% to >50% depending on methodology. The most-cited figure (~6-8%) places it well below 17αα orals (40-60%) but sufficient for clinical effect at 50-100 mg/day split dosing. For lean-mass-retention cutting cycles, both forms work; injectable is more cost-effective per bioactive milligram.
HPG suppression magnitude. Biohacker folklore says methenolone is "non-suppressive" — this traces to early animal studies at low doses and is not accurate at physique doses in humans. Modern user lab work consistently shows substantial LH/FSH suppression at 400+ mg/week. The "non-suppressive" claim is wrong at the doses people actually use.
Arnold Schwarzenegger anecdote. Multiple credible sources (Drasin, Zane, Columbu) name Primobolan + Dianabol as Arnold's Gold's Gym era cycle. Arnold himself has acknowledged AAS use and named both compounds in interviews. The Arnold-preference detail is real, with caveats: (a) 1970s pharma-grade Schering Primobolan was a different supply chain than 2026 UGL product; (b) Arnold's competitive context (Olympia-era bodybuilding) is incomparable to a 2026 MMA athlete + business owner archetype; (c) "Arnold used it" is celebrity testimony, not evidence-based recommendation.
Hepatotoxicity claim for oral acetate. Methenolone acetate is genuinely less hepatotoxic than 17αα orals (Allen 1968, Hast 1978 clinical data corroborate). This is well-established. The claim that it's "non-hepatotoxic" is overstated — fatal peliosis-hepatis-like outcome documented in severe aplastic anemia (Solans-Domenech 1993). Lower hepatotoxicity is real; zero hepatotoxicity is not.
▸ Verdict change log
- 2026-05-10 — Initial verdict: SKIP-AT-20 for this-archetype with HIGH confidence. Methenolone is the same family-logic SKIP as testosterone-enanthate, boldenone, and the rest of the AAS class for a 20yo MMA athlete. WADA S1.1a-banned with >30-day detection windows is career-ending for any tested promotion; HPG suppression at 20 risks long-term axis shutdown; counterfeit market (42-67% per published mass-spec analyses) means the user statistically pays methenolone prices for substituted testosterone or nandrolone; the "mild" reputation is relative-to-class and overstated at physique doses; no aesthetic / mass goal in this archetype is worth the regulatory + biological risk. HIGH (not MEDIUM) confidence because there is no plausible 20yo-MMA-athlete reframe that flips this. Methenolone has a narrow legitimate use profile (adult female users, advanced AAS literate, non-tested, lean-physique goal — among the most-defensible AAS choices for that population) but that profile does not match this user.
▸ Open questions / gaps Open
No published independent Phase 2/3 RCTs of methenolone for performance enhancement. The clinical evidence base (anemia, pediatric growth) is decades old; the performance-enhancement evidence is observational + anecdotal. Gap is class-wide and unlikely to close — no commercial sponsor will fund AAS performance-trial work.
Counterfeit prevalence — exact rate uncertain. Published seizure analyses cluster around 42-67% counterfeit rate but methodology differs (which countries' seizures, which lab techniques, which years). The order-of-magnitude is robust; the precise rate varies. Practical answer: assume any UGL "primobolan" is more-likely-than-not substituted unless third-party lab analysis says otherwise.
Detection window precision. Long-term sulfate metabolite detection has extended methenolone's WADA-relevant detection window from "~5-10 weeks" (legacy) to "30+ days for sulfate metabolites" (current LC-HRMS). Exact window is athlete-specific (genetic variation in sulfotransferase activity), dose-specific, and ester-specific. Tested athletes should assume detection is possible for substantially longer than vendor / community claims.
HPG recovery probability at 20 vs 25 vs 30+. Cohort data on HPG recovery after AAS in young users is sparse but Rasmussen 2016 suggests a sub-population develops persistent hypogonadism. The age-stratified probability is not well-quantified but the consensus view is that risk concentrates in <25, multiple cycles, and extended duration. Conservative read: 20 is too young; 25 is the conventional age-floor; 28-30 is when the archetype-relevance starts.
Female virilization permanence rate. Documented but not well-quantified in modern literature. Anecdotal and clinical-case-report data suggest voice changes and clitoromegaly are usually permanent; hair changes (hirsutism) often partially reversible; menstrual cycle disruption usually reversible. Better data would help female users make informed decisions; current evidence is largely "stop at first sign and hope."
References
Hast R et al. 1978 — Treatment of refractory anemias with methenolone (PMID 367090)
19-patient series
View StudyAmmus SS 1981 — Pathophysiology of aplastic anemia and treatment with methenolone enanthate (PMID 7467606)
mechanism review
View StudySchmidt-Gayk H et al. 1975 — Methenolone enanthate effect on albumin pool in liver cirrhosis (PMID 1224752)
historic hepatic-use reference
View StudySolans-Domenech M et al. 1993 — Fatal outcome after metenolone acetate in severe aplastic anemia (PMID 8334198)
rare-serious adverse outcome
View StudySchänzer W, Geyer H, Donike M 1990 — Identification of new urinary metabolites of methenolone (PMID 2242348)
metabolite mapping for doping detection
View StudySaudan C et al. 2015 — Sulfo-conjugated vs gluco-conjugated metabolites for methenolone misuse detection (PMID 26259657)
extended-detection-window WADA work
View StudyAlbertsdóttir AD et al. 2020 — Long-term urinary metabolites of metenolone via GC-MS focus on non-hydrolysed sulfates (PMID 32386339)
current state of doping detection
View StudyMagnolato A et al. 2017 — GC-MS quantitative analysis of black-market AAS seized by Brazilian Federal Police (PMID 28432962)
counterfeit prevalence empirical data
View StudyCoopman V et al. 2022 — Fake AAS on the black market: systematic review and meta-analysis (PMC9288681)
42% counterfeit, 67.5% under-dosed
View StudyBond P et al. 2022 — AAS-induced liver injury: An update (PMC9331524)
non-17αα agents substantially safer
View StudyPope HG Jr et al. 2014 — Adverse Health Consequences of Performance-Enhancing Drugs (Endocrine Reviews 35:341)
AAS adverse effects review
View StudyRasmussen JJ et al. 2016 — Former AAS users with persistent hypogonadism (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:1396)
long-term HPG dysfunction
View StudySaartok T, Dahlberg E, Gustafsson JA 1984 — Relative AAS binding affinity to AR and SHBG (PMID 6539197)
methenolone AR-binding and SHBG-binding data
View StudyHartgens F, Kuipers H 2004 — Effects of AAS in athletes (Sports Medicine)
class-wide physiology + side-effect review
View StudyDEA Diversion Control: Anabolic Steroids
Schedule III status, federal law context
View SourceWADA 2026 Prohibited List
S1.1a banned at all times, detection-window context
View SourceWikipedia: Metenolone enanthate
general background, history, Schering 1962 licensing
View SourcePubChem CID 248271 — Methenolone Enanthate
ester form molecular reference
View SourceAllen DM et al. 1968 — Anabolic Androgenic Steroids in the Treatment of Acquired Aplastic Anemia (Blood 34:283)
foundational clinical evidence
View SourceMusshoff F, Daldrup T — Black Market in Anabolic Steroids
European seizure analysis
View SourceLiverTox: Androgenic Steroids (NCBI Bookshelf NBK548931)
NIH-curated drug-induced liver injury reference
View SourceVanberg P, Atar D 2010 — AAS abuse and the cardiovascular system (Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology)
CV mechanism review
View SourceHow was your experience with this compound?
Anonymous · one vote per session · results below at 5+ votes.
See something off?
Most of this wiki is AI-generated. Suggest a correction, dosing update, or new evidence — we review every submission.