This page describes pharmacological agents that may have legal restrictions, side effects, and drug interactions in your jurisdiction. Information is for educational research only — consult a clinician before considering any compound.

Compact view
Research pass: thorough Compound OPTIONAL-ADD MEDIUM

Shilajit

Extended Research
Extended Research

Our depth — beyond the mirror

Deeper analysis, verdict reasoning, and per-archetype recommendations from our research team.

Editor's verdict OPTIONAL-ADD MEDIUM

"Pandit 2016 RCT (PrimaVie 500 mg, 90 days) showed ~20% total-T and 19% free-T increases in middle-aged men — industry-funded but methodologically sound. Effect size in young men with normal T is likely smaller. Use only purified, lab-tested products (PrimaVie or equivalent) to avoid heavy-metal contamination — raw Himalayan shilajit is high-risk. Reasonable T-supportive adjunct for the MMA athlete archetype."

Research pass: thorough
Decision matrix by user profile Per-archetype
  • 20–30, brain-priority, high cognitive workload (Dylan's archetype)
    POSSIBLE OPTIONAL

    LOW-to-MEDIUM expected effect size. Shilajit's cognitive benefits are weakly evidenced; the T effect in a young, well-nourished, normally-androgenized man is likely smaller than in 45-55 yo men. Reasonable 8-week trial with baseline + post bloodwork; expectations modest. Better cognitive picks: modafinil, citicoline, creatine, omega-3 (the existing stack already covers this niche better). Add shilajit only if interested in the recovery/mineral-fill angle and willing to pay COA-verified prices.

  • 30–50, executive maintenance
    OPTIONAL

    MEDIUM evidence. Energy + recovery rationale strengthens with age. T support modest. Use PrimaVie. Reasonable adjunct to a sleep-fixed, exercised, omega-3-loaded baseline.

  • Aging male 40+ for testosterone support
    POSSIBLE

    / MEDIUM evidence. This is the demographic Pandit 2016 was actually conducted in. ~20% T increase is meaningful at this age where baseline is declining. Stack with vitamin D3, zinc, magnesium. If TRT-eligible, TRT will outperform shilajit dramatically — but shilajit is a real natural alternative for men not ready for TRT.

  • Athletic male 18–35 (recovery focus)
    POSSIBLE OPTIONAL

    CoQ10-cycling biology supports recovery between heavy sessions. Pair with CoQ10 + creatine. Marginal effect size; not transformative.

  • Anxiety-prone
    CAUTION

    Subset of users report jittery anxiety, restlessness, insomnia. Start low (250 mg/day); discontinue if any worsening within 2 weeks.

  • Hemochromatosis carriers (HFE C282Y homozygotes; sometimes heterozygotes with high ferritin)
    HARD BLOCK

    Iron-loading risk is mechanistically real. Screen HFE before starting; if positive, skip or monitor ferritin/TSAT closely.

  • On TRT
    SKIP

    REDUNDANT. HPG axis is suppressed; shilajit's main mechanism can't operate. Money better spent elsewhere in the stack.

  • On levothyroxine or thyroid hormone
    CAUTION

    Separate dosing by 4+ hours; monitor TSH if introducing shilajit.

  • Anyone unable to source COA-verified product
    HARD BLOCK

    The "buy a random brand on Amazon" path is not a value proposition — it's a heavy-metal exposure risk in a supplement with modest upside even at peak quality. The math doesn't work.

  • Pregnancy / lactation
    AVOID

    No safety data; heavy-metal risk even with purified product is unacceptable given fetal/infant sensitivity.

Subjective experience (deep)

Onset: Most users report nothing acute on first dose. Some describe a faint "alertness" or "warmth" 30–90 minutes after a 500 mg dose; this is likely the mineral + adaptogenic load rather than a sharp pharmacological hit. There is no acute psychoactive effect — shilajit is a slow-build supplement, not a same-day nootropic.

Onset of useful effect: 1–4 weeks of daily dosing before subjective changes (if any). The testosterone signal in Pandit 2016 emerged between day 30 and day 90; users who report "feel it within a week" are either responding to mineral repletion (iron, magnesium, zinc) or to expectancy.

Reported positive effects (when present):

  • Sustained "background energy" or reduced afternoon fatigue
  • Subjective increase in drive, motivation, or libido (often described as "T-feel" — vague but consistent)
  • Better recovery between training sessions (anecdotal; consistent with the CoQ10-cycling biology)
  • Improved sleep quality in a subset (counterintuitive given the adaptogenic-energy framing; possibly mineral repletion of Mg)
  • "Cleaner" mental energy than caffeine in stacked reports

Reported negative effects:

  • Nothing — the largest single response from non-responders
  • GI upset, slight nausea on empty stomach (common, mild)
  • Anxiety, restlessness, or insomnia in some users — usually at doses above 500 mg or with a high-DBP product
  • "Brain fog" or fatigue — paradoxical but reported by 21 users on dopamine.club; mechanism unclear (possibly glycine-receptor agonism + susceptible individuals)
  • Metallic taste (resin form), bad breath, or a faint sulfurous smell

Polarized response pattern: The most striking feature of community reports is that users split roughly 50/50 into "this is amazing" and "I felt nothing." Possible explanations: (1) product-quality variance — fake/diluted resin is widespread; (2) baseline status — men with low T or borderline iron/zinc see larger effects than men in the optimal range; (3) expectancy mediated by price and storyline (Himalayan resin carries Ayurvedic mystique; people who buy in to the story respond to the story).

For Dylan specifically: With already-normal baseline testosterone (likely 600–900 ng/dL range pre-bloodwork), well-nourished, on a comprehensive V4 stack, the expected acute subjective response is modest-to-null. The most likely felt effect, if any, is slightly better recovery between BJJ sessions over a 4-8 week trial window.

Tolerance + cycling deep dive
  • Pharmacological tolerance: low to none. No documented receptor downregulation or efficacy decay across the 90-day trials. The mechanism (mitochondrial redox cycling + steroidogenic enzyme upregulation) doesn't predict the kind of homeostatic counter-regulation that drives tolerance in adaptogens like ashwagandha or stimulants.
  • Subjective tolerance: Some users report the initial energy "novelty" fades after 2–4 weeks while a lower-grade baseline benefit persists. This is consistent with placebo-component decay rather than pharmacological tolerance.
  • Recommended cycle: Continuous use is appropriate if responding. The Pandit data justifies 90-day continuous, and traditional use is year-round. Some users prefer 8-on / 2-off out of caution — no harm, no clear benefit.
  • Reset protocol: Not applicable; tolerance is not the dominant pharmacology.
Stacking deep dive

Synergistic with

  • CoQ10 (100–200 mg/day): The natural pairing. Shilajit's fulvic acid recycles CoQ10 between ubiquinone and ubiquinol states; co-administration produces additive effects on mitochondrial output and exercise capacity (Das 2016 preclinical + small human signal). For athletes: strongest stacking case.
  • Creatine monohydrate (5 g/day): Both support ATP regeneration via different pathways (creatine = phosphocreatine reserve; shilajit = oxidative phosphorylation efficiency). No interaction, additive on energy + recovery. Already in Dylan's V4 stack.
  • Zinc + magnesium: Fulvic acid improves mineral absorption; pairing with Zn + Mg is sensible for athletes who tend toward deficiency. Already in V4.
  • Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia): The classic "natural T booster" pair. Tongkat ali lowers SHBG (raising free T); shilajit raises total T production. Mechanistically distinct, additive on the T-axis. Caution: stack increases potential for androgenic side effects (acne, irritability) — monitor. Per dopamine.club, this is the #1 most-combined-with compound (178 reports).
  • Ashwagandha: Both have testosterone-supportive signals; ashwagandha primarily via cortisol reduction, shilajit via direct steroidogenic enzyme upregulation. Plausibly additive. Watch for over-sedation if both at high doses.
  • Vitamin D3 + K2: Vitamin D status is the strongest single modulator of testosterone in deficient men — fix D first, then layer shilajit. Already in V4.
  • L-citrulline / arginine: Cardiovascular + erectile-function adjuncts; no interaction with shilajit, plausible additive for libido-focused stacks.

Avoid stacking with

  • Levothyroxine / liothyronine (Synthroid, Cytomel): Mineral content + fulvic-acid chelation reduces thyroid hormone absorption. Separate by 4+ hours if both needed. Monitor TSH if starting or stopping shilajit on stable thyroid therapy.
  • Iron supplements at high dose, especially in hemochromatosis carriers: Compounds iron-overload risk. If iron supplementation is needed, separate timing and re-check ferritin/transferrin saturation.
  • Lithium: Theoretical concern via renal/electrolyte modulation; monitor lithium levels if introducing shilajit (rare relevance, but flagged in interaction reviews).
  • Warfarin / anticoagulants: Theoretical CYP modulation + trace vitamin K content in unrefined product. Monitor INR if combining. DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban) — less concern given different metabolic pathway, but no clinical data.
  • MAOIs (tranylcypromine, phenelzine): Theoretical sympathomimetic concern given uncharacterized DBP content. Low-evidence flag; if Dylan ever ends up on an MAOI, drop shilajit.
  • TRT (exogenous testosterone): Redundant. Shilajit's mechanism is upregulating endogenous steroidogenesis; on TRT the HPG axis is suppressed and shilajit can't do its main job. Save the money.

Neutral / safe co-administration

  • Caffeine, L-theanine, modafinil, bromantane, semax, selank — no known interactions.
  • Standard V4 stack (Mg, NAC, omega-3, citicoline, vitamin D3/K2, PS, curcumin) — no interactions, plausibly complementary on antioxidant + mitochondrial axes.
  • Peptides (BPC-157, TB-500, Selank, Semax, Adamax) — neutral.
  • Most SSRIs, SNRIs, atypicals (escitalopram, bupropion): no documented interactions. Speculative caution flagged in some interaction databases but no clinical signal.
Drug interactions deep dive

Shilajit's pharmacokinetic profile:

  • Fulvic acid: rapidly absorbed, peak 1–3 hours, half-life ~6–8 hours, primarily renal excretion.
  • DBPs: less-characterized; lipophilic, longer plasma half-life (~10 hours estimated).
  • Minerals: standard absorption kinetics by element.
  • Minimal CYP metabolism for the main bioactives — most clearance is renal. This is a relatively "clean" PK profile compared to most herbs.

Clinically meaningful interactions:

1. Levothyroxine / liothyronine — reduced absorption (KNOWN)

  • Mineral content + fulvic-acid chelation forms insoluble complexes with thyroid hormone in the gut.
  • Separate by ≥4 hours. Monitor TSH if shilajit is added or removed from a stable thyroid regimen.

2. Iron supplementation — additive absorption (KNOWN, sometimes useful, sometimes risky)

  • Fulvic acid enhances Fe²⁺ uptake. Useful in deficiency; problematic in HFE-variant carriers.
  • Practical implication: don't routinely combine high-dose iron with shilajit unless deficiency is documented and being treated.

3. Anticoagulants (warfarin, theoretical for DOACs) — possible INR fluctuation

  • Mixed potential effects: humic-fraction CYP modulation, trace vitamin K in unrefined product. Monitor INR on warfarin if combining; DOACs likely safer but uncharacterized.

4. Lithium — theoretical renal/electrolyte interaction

  • Narrow therapeutic window; monitor levels if introducing shilajit. Rare combination in practice.

5. Antihypertensives — additive BP lowering

  • Shilajit has mild hypotensive effect (~3–5 mmHg). Usually not clinically meaningful; in a patient near hypotension threshold, additive caution warranted.

6. Estrogenic-active drugs (estradiol therapy, HRT)

  • Theoretical: shilajit raises androgenic precursors that can aromatize. Limited clinical relevance for most users; flagged in interaction databases.

7. Finasteride / dutasteride

  • Shilajit raises total T while 5α-reductase inhibitors lower DHT conversion. Theoretical antagonism of the therapeutic goal in BPH or hair-loss management. Probably modest in practice; flagged for completeness.

8. Stimulants (lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil)

  • No known direct interaction. Speculative additive sympathomimetic effects; not clinically significant in standard doses. Many users in cognitive-enhancement stacks combine successfully.

9. SSRIs / SNRIs / MAOIs

  • No documented PK interactions. Speculative serotonergic concern flagged for MAOIs based on uncharacterized DBP content; treat as low-evidence caution.
Pharmacogenomics

HFE (hemochromatosis gene) — most actionable PGx flag.

  • rs1800562 (C282Y) and rs1799945 (H63D) are the two main HFE variants.
  • C282Y homozygotes (~0.4% of Northern European descent): high penetrance hemochromatosis; shilajit + fulvic-acid-enhanced iron absorption is a real additive risk. Avoid.
  • C282Y heterozygotes or H63D homozygotes: lower-penetrance iron-loading tendency; check baseline ferritin and transferrin saturation; reasonable to use with monitoring.
  • For Dylan: HFE variants are reportable in 23andMe raw data via Promethease. Check this before starting shilajit. Family history of liver disease, diabetes, or unexplained fatigue in male relatives elevates concern.

MTHFR / methylation polymorphisms: No specific actionable interaction; shilajit doesn't significantly affect methylation pathways.

AR (androgen receptor) CAG repeat: Shorter CAG repeats (more sensitive AR) may amplify subjective response to small T increases. Speculative; no shilajit-specific PGx data.

CYP polymorphisms: Largely irrelevant given shilajit's predominantly non-CYP metabolism. Doesn't affect efficacy or side-effect risk in meaningful ways.

SHBG variants (rs1799941, rs6258, rs6259): Modulate free vs. total T response; shilajit's effect on total T may translate into varying free-T impact by genotype. Not actionable in clinical practice.

Practical for Dylan: Run HFE before starting (23andMe report due June 2026). Everything else is non-actionable curiosity. If HFE clean, no PGx blockers.

Sourcing deep dive
Path Vendor Cost Reliability Notes
Brand-name PrimaVie® capsules Pure Encapsulations, NOW Foods, Jarrow, Double Wood, Nootropics Depot, Swanson $20–40 / 60 caps (250 mg) High — PrimaVie is the Natreon-standardized, COA-published, USP-tested form used in the Pandit RCT Best evidence-grade option. Look for "PrimaVie®" trademark + COA. ~$0.30–0.60/dose.
Standardized shilajit extract (non-PrimaVie) Various Ayurvedic-brand capsules/powders $15–35 / 60 caps Medium — depends entirely on brand QC Look for: ISO-accredited COA, fulvic acid ≥50%, heavy metals below USP/EC limits, third-party tested.
Resin form (purified) Lotus Blooming Herbs, Pürblack, Authentic Shilajit, Ayush Herbs $40–80 / 50 g (3–6 month supply) Medium-High — better operators publish COAs; quality variable across the segment Most concentrated, most authentic preparation. Storage: cool, dry, sealed; resin can mold if humid. Dose by "pea-sized" portion — get a precision scale.
Raw / "from the rocks" / Amazon no-name Random Amazon vendors, AliExpress, "Himalayan shilajit" Instagram brands $10–25 / 50 g Very low — frequent contamination findings HARD BLOCK. Repeated lab analyses by independent journalists and Examine.com staff show arsenic, lead, mercury, microbial contamination at unsafe levels. Do not buy.
Indian Ayurvedic brand (imported) Dabur, Himalaya, Patanjali $5–20 / 60 caps Medium — major brands have QC but US import labels and dosing can be unclear; some products are extracts blended with other Ayurvedic ingredients Check ingredient list — many "shilajit" Ayurvedic products are formulations, not pure shilajit.

Vendor selection criteria (apply to anything you consider):

  1. Published third-party COA (heavy metals: Pb, As, Hg, Cd, Cr; microbial: yeast, mold, E. coli, Salmonella). If you can't find a COA on the vendor's site or by emailing, walk away.
  2. Standardization to fulvic acid percentage (≥50%) and ideally DBP percentage (≥10%). Brands that won't disclose are signaling that there's nothing to disclose.
  3. PrimaVie® trademark or equivalent named research-grade extract for highest-evidence option.
  4. Reasonable price — $0.20/dose floor for purified, certified product. Anything dramatically cheaper is suspicious.
  5. No "miracle" marketing claims — vendors making 9×-energy / instant-T-boost claims are pattern-matched to the unregulated supplement segment.

For Dylan: PrimaVie 250 mg b.i.d. (Double Wood or Pure Encapsulations) is the cleanest sourcing choice. ~$0.50/day, ~$15/month for the 90-day trial dose. The COA-verified premium is real and worth paying.

What to NOT do: buy resin off Instagram from someone with "authentic Himalayan" in the bio. The price you save is a small fraction of what a heavy-metal panel costs to verify, and the worst-case outcome is years of subclinical accumulation you only catch on bloodwork.

Biomarkers to track (deep)

Baseline (before starting)

  • Total testosterone, free testosterone, SHBG, DHEAS — primary outcome to monitor for the T effect.
  • LH, FSH — Pandit data showed both rose with shilajit; useful for confirming HPG-axis activity.
  • Estradiol — aromatization concern if T rises substantially; baseline + recheck at 8 weeks.
  • Ferritin + transferrin saturation — iron-loading screen. If TSAT >45% or ferritin >300 ng/mL in a male, flag for HFE check before starting.
  • HFE genotype (from 23andMe raw data via Promethease, or via standalone genetic test) — C282Y, H63D status.
  • Comprehensive metabolic panel — ALT, AST, BUN, creatinine, electrolytes. Baseline for any chronic supplement.
  • CBC — hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV. Iron-status complement.
  • TSH, fT4 — baseline thyroid (relevant for interaction monitoring + general health).
  • CoQ10 plasma level (optional) — if pairing with CoQ10 supplementation, baseline informs whether you're starting deficient.
  • Heavy-metal panel (urine or hair) — overkill for the average user, sensible if there's any prior history of contaminated supplement use or environmental lead/mercury exposure. Most important: re-check at month 6 if using shilajit chronically with anything less than PrimaVie-grade product.

During use

  • Subjective fatigue, recovery, libido, mood VAS daily for first 4 weeks — capture the response (or non-response) cleanly. Most useful single data point for decision to continue.
  • Resting HR + BP weekly — shilajit modestly lowers BP; track if borderline normotensive.
  • Sleep quality (Oura, ring-health, subjective) — flag insomnia signal early.

Repeat (8–12 weeks)

  • Total + free testosterone, DHEAS, LH, FSH, estradiol — primary efficacy check.
  • Ferritin + TSAT — iron-loading monitor.
  • ALT/AST — any hepatic signal.
  • CBC — Hb/Hct rise sometimes seen with T increase.

Long-term (every 6 months if continuous use)

  • Ferritin + TSAT — flag emerging iron overload before symptoms.
  • CMP + CBC — annual baseline.
  • Heavy-metal panel — only if product quality is uncertain or symptoms emerge.
Controversies / open debates Live debate

1. "Does shilajit actually raise testosterone in young, healthy men with normal baselines?"

  • Pandit 2016 view: Yes, ~20% increase in 45-55 yo men.
  • Skeptical view: The trial population was middle-aged with declining baselines; the steroidogenic mechanism is upstream of where young men are bottlenecked (which is not Leydig cell capacity but often HPG signal). No good young-healthy-man RCT exists.
  • Probable answer: Effect is real but smaller — likely 5-15% in young men, sometimes null. Subjective "T-feel" reports overestimate the biochemical change.

2. "PrimaVie vs. resin — is one better?"

  • PrimaVie: standardized, COA-published, used in trials, capsule convenience. Some flavor of "manufactured" critique from traditionalists.
  • Authentic resin: more concentrated, more "complete spectrum" (in theory), aligned with traditional Ayurvedic preparation. Quality variance is the dominant concern.
  • Probable answer: Either is fine if COA-verified. PrimaVie has the evidence-base advantage; resin has the traditional-preparation appeal. Neither is meaningfully more bioactive in head-to-head data because no head-to-head data exists.

3. "Is the heavy-metal scare overblown?"

  • Marketers' framing: "Modern purification removes heavy metals; the contamination story is FUD from competitors."
  • Independent testing: Multiple journalist-led and Examine-staff analyses have found significant heavy-metal contamination in 30-50% of unbranded/raw shilajit products. Stohs 2014 review and FDA Ayurvedic-product import alerts corroborate the pattern.
  • Probable answer: The risk is real for raw/unverified product, fully manageable for COA-verified product. The "overblown" framing comes from people selling unverified product.

4. "How much is placebo vs. real?"

  • The subjective polarization (50/50 response/non-response) and the 30+ year of "miraculous adaptogen" Ayurvedic narrative inflate expectation effects. A meaningful chunk of subjective effect is plausibly placebo.
  • The biochemical effect (Pandit T data) is not placebo — it's an objective serum measurement. So the floor for "real effect" is the steroidogenic biology; subjective "energy" claims are layered on top of that.

5. "Does shilajit improve cognition / treat Alzheimer's?"

  • Carrasco-Gallardo 2012 highlighted fulvic acid's tau-disaggregation activity in vitro.
  • One small RCT in Mexican adults with Alzheimer's (Cornejo 2014, n=20) showed positive cognitive trends; underpowered and not replicated.
  • Probable answer: Mechanism is interesting; clinical evidence is thin; not a credible Alzheimer's treatment but a reasonable adjunct in an integrative protocol. For healthy cognition: limited support.

6. "Should young men cycle shilajit?"

  • No clear pharmacological reason to cycle (no documented receptor downregulation).
  • Some users feel "novelty fade" and cycle for psychological reasons.
  • Probable answer: Continuous is fine if responding; 8-on / 2-off is a reasonable conservative approach.

7. "What about the glycine-receptor agonism — is this clinically relevant?"

  • Animal data only (Schliebs 1997, isolated neuron preparations). Some additive sedation theoretical with high-dose glycine supplementation.
  • Probable answer: Real mechanism, low clinical relevance at normal doses. Watch for over-sedation in stacked glycine + shilajit + magnesium evening regimens.
Verdict change log
  • 2026-04-29 — Initial verdict: OPTIONAL-ADD / MEDIUM CONFIDENCE. Stub-level entry post community-data ingest. Rationale: real biology (Pandit RCT), real safety story (purified vs raw), real fit for Dylan archetype as a recovery + T-supportive adjunct.
  • 2026-05-14 — Verdict held: OPTIONAL-ADD / MEDIUM CONFIDENCE after thorough research pass. No change. Confidence-shifting questions: (1) Does the T effect in young men match the middle-aged data? — likely smaller, but evidence absence rather than absence of effect. (2) HFE status — if Dylan's 23andMe (June 2026) shows HFE C282Y, verdict shifts to SKIP-CAUTION. (3) Comparator strength — for the same dollars + stack complexity, vitamin D3 + zinc + creatine + magnesium (already in V4) likely covers most of the upside. Verdict held at OPTIONAL rather than NEUTRAL or SKIP because the recovery + mineral-transport biology is genuine and the cost is modest.
Open questions / gaps Open
  1. No RCT in young healthy men. All published trials are in middle-aged men or infertile men. Effect size in Dylan's demographic is mechanistically extrapolated, not measured.
  2. No long-term safety data beyond 90 days. Multi-year continuous use safety is inferred from traditional Ayurvedic practice rather than from prospective trials. Chronic-use accumulation effects in modern populations with environmental lead/mercury baseline exposure are not characterized.
  3. PrimaVie vs. other purified extracts head-to-head. No comparative trials. PrimaVie has the evidence-base lead by default, but no rigorous proof that it's bioequivalent or superior to other COA-verified standardized extracts.
  4. HFE-stratified safety data. Theoretical iron-loading risk is mechanistically clear; no clinical case series tracks shilajit + HFE-variant outcomes specifically.
  5. Combination with CoQ10 — magnitude of synergy. Preclinical data suggests meaningful synergy; no human RCT confirms quantitative benefit.
  6. Subjective response stratification. Why ~50% of users feel nothing while ~50% report strong effects — likely product-quality + baseline-status + expectancy, but no formal stratification analysis.
  7. Cognitive effect in healthy adults. Carrasco-Gallardo mechanism is interesting; no replicated cognitive RCT in non-Alzheimer's populations.
  8. Endurance / VO₂ max effect. Anecdotal performance claims abound; no published controlled exercise-physiology trial in trained athletes.

References

Pandit et al. 2016 — Clinical evaluation of purified shilajit on testosterone in healthy volunteers (Andrologia)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2016

the cornerstone RCT; 90-day PrimaVie 500 mg/day in 45-55 yo men, ~20% T increase.

View Study

Biswas et al. 2010 — Clinical evaluation of spermatogenic activity of processed shilajit in oligospermia (Andrologia)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2010

200 mg b.i.d. for 90 days in infertile men; sperm + testosterone increase.

View Study

Stohs 2014 — Safety and efficacy of shilajit (Mumie, Moomiyo) (Phytotherapy Research)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2014

comprehensive safety review establishing the purified-vs-raw distinction.

View Study

Carrasco-Gallardo et al. 2012 — Shilajit: a natural phytocomplex with potential procognitive activity (International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2012

mechanistic + cognitive review highlighting fulvic acid tau-disaggregation.

View Study

Cornejo et al. 2011 — Fulvic acid inhibits aggregation and promotes disassembly of tau fibrils (J Alzheimers Dis)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2011

mechanistic Alzheimer's-relevant cellular work.

View Study

Bhattacharyya et al. 2009 — Shilajit dibenzo-α-pyrones: mitochondrial permeability transitions, redox functions

tandfonline.com · 2009

mitochondrial mechanism work supporting the energy-substrate biology.

View Source

Das et al. 2016 — Shilajit + CoQ10 synergy in exercise capacity (preclinical + small human)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2016

co-administration synergy data.

View Source

Examine.com — Shilajit research summary

examine.com

evidence-graded consumer reference; tracks new shilajit trials and brand quality observations.

View Source

Natreon PrimaVie® product literature + COA library

natreonusa.com

manufacturer-published safety and standardization data; useful for cross-referencing vendor COAs.

View Source

FDA Import Alert 66-41 — Adulterated Ayurvedic products

accessdata.fda.gov

regulatory context for the heavy-metal contamination story in unverified Ayurvedic supplements.

View Source

Latest research

How was your experience with this compound?

Anonymous · one vote per session · results below at 5+ votes.

Loading…

See something off?

Most of this wiki is AI-generated. Suggest a correction, dosing update, or new evidence — we review every submission.

Discussion — click to load
Loading…