This page describes pharmacological agents that may have legal restrictions, side effects, and drug interactions in your jurisdiction. Information is for educational research only — consult a clinician before considering any compound.

Compact view
Research pass: medium-thorough Compound SKIP-FOR-NOW HIGH

Superdrol

Extended Research
High-risk compound

Surface here is educational only; do not use without medical supervision. Our editorial verdict is SKIP-FOR-NOW — current cost / risk / redundancy puts it below the line.

Extended Research

Our depth — beyond the mirror

Deeper analysis, verdict reasoning, and per-archetype recommendations from our research team.

Editor's verdict SKIP-FOR-NOW HIGH

For a 20-year-old MMA athlete + business owner with intact HPG axis at peak endogenous testosterone production, brain-priority archetype, Superdrol fails on every axis with the hepatotoxicity argument dominant — (1) zero medical indication; methasterone has never been FDA-approved for any condition; (2) hepatotoxicity is the dominant concern and arguably worst-in-class — multiple peer-reviewed case reports of severe cholestatic hepatitis in healthy young users (Singh 2009 PMID 19232584, Schwartz 2008 PMID 18391541, Nasr 2009 PMID 19412565, El Sherrif 2014 PMID 24190502, Jasiurkowski 2006 PMID 16863581), with bilirubin commonly 20-30 mg/dL, prolonged hospitalization required, and at least one published case progressing to liver transplant evaluation; LiverTox Likelihood A; (3) MMA-context career risk — WADA-banned, USADA-banned (UFC), state athletic commissions test, detection windows for designer-steroid metabolites are long; (4) legality — Schedule III felony possession in US since DASCA 2014; UGL product carries counterfeit + mislabeling + contamination risk; (5) lipid and CV impact severe — HDL crash 60-80%, LDL elevation 40-60%, BP elevation, polycythemia risk; (6) reversibility limited — DILI from Superdrol can take 8-16 weeks to normalize; cholestatic injury has been reported to present or worsen up to 4-8 weeks AFTER cessation; (7) no estrogen-mediated cosmetic side effects (non-aromatizing, no ER binding) is the only "advantage" — that is the entire reason it became popular and the entire reason it killed people's livers. Verdict would only flip in counterfactuals (medically diagnosed catabolic-wasting state with both injectable testosterone and oxandrolone contraindicated) that are not on any realistic horizon and would still strictly favor cleaner alternatives. Among all oral AAS, Superdrol is the single hardest SKIP for the user's archetype.

Research pass: medium-thorough
Decision matrix by user profile Per-archetype
  • 20-25, brain-priority, MMA athlete (the user)
    SKIP-AT-

    at HIGH confidence. No medical indication; peak endogenous testosterone; combat sport drug-tested; hepatotoxicity is the dominant concern and arguably worst-in-class among oral AAS; case-report cluster of severe cholestatic DILI with at least one transplant-evaluation case; WADA + state athletic commission ban makes any positive test career-ending; Schedule III legality post-DASCA 2014. The single hardest SKIP among oral AAS for this archetype.

  • 25-30, gym-focused, untested
    SKIP

    for almost all profiles. Strictly dominated by oxandrolone (cleaner per mg) for any oral-AAS use case; strictly dominated by injectable primobolan for any "dry/hard" aesthetic case. The Superdrol-specific case-report DILI cluster makes any oral-AAS use case better served by alternatives.

  • 30-50, executive maintenance
    SKIP

    No good rationale. Use injectable T-enanthate at TRT dose if labs warrant.

  • 50+, established hypogonadism, post-andropause
    SKIP

    Injectable T-enanthate / cypionate at TRT dose is the right tool. Superdrol adds catastrophic hepatic risk without benefit.

  • Female athlete, any age
    SKIP-PERMANENT

    Virilization risk from any AAS is high; methasterone's androgenic signal at supraphysiologic dose causes irreversible voice deepening, clitoral enlargement, hair patterning. Plus the hepatic risk. Oxandrolone is the only oral AAS with any defensible women's-athlete use case.

  • Drug-tested at any tier (WADA, USADA, NCAA, employer, military, state athletic commission)
    SKIP-PERMANENT

    Detection windows for designer-steroid metabolites can extend 2-4+ months post-discontinuation. WADA labs target methasterone metabolites. Career risk dwarfs benefit.

  • Bodybuilder, untested, accepting full risk
    OPTIONAL-USE

    only with extreme caveats. This was the historical user base. The 2-4 week cycle ceiling is absolute. Required harm-reduction stack (TUDCA + NAC + milk thistle) does NOT make Superdrol safe — multiple case-report DILI events occurred in users on full harm-reduction stacks. Among all oral AAS, Superdrol is the highest-risk "elective" choice.

  • Liver disease (any), Gilbert's, prior DILI history, hepatotoxic-drug history
    HARD BLOCK

    Compounded hepatic risk; not worth running.

  • Cardiovascular risk factors (HTN, dyslipidemia, family CAD)
    HARD BLOCK

    Lipid + BP disruption compounds existing risk. Severe lipid impact of Superdrol particularly.

  • Mood disorder (bipolar, psychosis history, severe anxiety)
    HARD BLOCK

    AAS-induced mood lability + aggression risk; methasterone's CNS arousal effect is a particular trigger.

  • Subclinical BSEP/MRP2 variants (ATP8B1/ABCB11 polymorphisms)
    HARD BLOCK

    El Sherrif 2014 demonstrated dramatic susceptibility. These variants are not on consumer 23andMe in 2026 but the existence of the susceptibility population means baseline Superdrol DILI rates underestimate the per-user risk.

Subjective experience (deep)

Per supplement-era user cohorts and modern UGL community reports at 10-30 mg/day:

  • Day 3-7: Strength surge, increased aggression / "on edge" feeling, scale weight up 2-5 lb (primarily glycogen — no water retention because non-aromatizing). Subjective sense of "hardness" and vascularity. BP creep typically begins by day 4-5.
  • Week 1-2: Continued strength gains, dry/lean look intensifying. ALT/AST detectably elevated by day 10. HDL crashing rapidly. BP elevation 10-20 mmHg above baseline common. Sleep disruption common (CNS arousal + BP elevation).
  • Week 2-4: Plateau onset. LFTs often peak in this window — ALT 3-5× ULN typical, sometimes much higher. Cholestatic injury onset most commonly presents weeks 2-6 — pruritus without rash, dark urine, light stool, RUQ pain, jaundice, weight loss, severe fatigue. Any of these signs requires immediate cessation and ED evaluation. HDL crash often 60-80% of baseline. HCT climbing.
  • Week 4-6 (if continued — strongly inadvisable): Diminishing returns vs. sharply accelerating side-effect curve. Most published case reports of severe DILI involved users who pushed past 4 weeks. Some published cases involved users at exactly the supplement-bottle-recommended 4 weeks.
  • Post-cycle: Strength + scale weight retention better than dianabol/anadrol (because gain is less water-driven). HPG suppression established; testicular atrophy, low T, impaired libido for 8-16 weeks. PCT 4-6 weeks. LFTs may take 8-16 weeks to normalize in users who developed DILI signs on cycle. Lipids typically 12-24 weeks. HPG axis 12-24 weeks. Cholestatic injury can present or worsen up to 4-8 weeks AFTER cessation — this is a documented pattern.
  • Mood / cognitive: Aggression / mood lability common. "On edge," conflict-seeking, sleep disruption. Some users report subjective focus / drive boost, others describe pure irritability. CNS arousal effect.
  • Libido: High during cycle (androgenic surge), often low post-cycle during HPG recovery.

Reality check for combat sport: Superdrol's "dry, hard" profile is theoretically appealing for combat sport (less water-retention liability than dianabol/anadrol). But the hepatotoxicity, BP elevation, mood instability, and detection windows make this academically interesting at best. The case-report cluster makes any use uniquely high-risk among oral AAS. For a 20yo MMA athlete: do not use.

Tolerance + cycling deep dive
  • Tolerance buildup: Real and rapid for the anabolic signal — strength gains plateau by week 3-4 even at constant dose. Receptor downregulation + HPG suppression. There is no protocol to "blast through" the plateau without dose escalation, which compounds toxicity non-linearly. Superdrol's risk curve gets dramatically worse past 4 weeks; dose escalation is uniquely poor risk-reward.
  • Cycle length: NEVER >6 weeks oral; 2-4 weeks is the prudent ceiling. This is the shortest cycle ceiling of any oral AAS. Most prudent runs are 2-3 weeks. Some run 4 weeks at 10 mg/day. The hepatic-injury risk curve steepens past 4 weeks, faster than for dianabol or anadrol.
  • Washout: Minimum 16 weeks before next 17αAA exposure of any kind (longer than typical due to hepatotoxicity ceiling). Liver enzymes should return to baseline; lipid panel should normalize; HPG axis should recover. Re-exposure in users who had any DILI signs is a hard contraindication.
  • Bridging / "blast and cruise": Some bodybuilding protocols run continuous orals. Don't. Acute hepatic failure cases overwhelmingly cluster in continuous-oral users, and Superdrol is the worst candidate for this approach.
  • Re-cycling: Possible in principle but each oral exposure compounds cumulative hepatic burden. The user should run zero cycles. Even adult bodybuilding consensus is 1 oral cycle per year max for Superdrol specifically.
Stacking deep dive

Synergistic (in bodybuilding context — none recommended for the user)

  • testosterone (injectable T-enanthate / T-cypionate). Standard kickstart pair. Superdrol weeks 1-3 (rapid early gains, dry profile), Test-E 400-500 mg/week weeks 1-12 (sustained anabolic). The synergy is real (mechanism-additive AR signaling); it does not address the dominant Superdrol hepatic risk. The injectable T does nothing for the C17α-alkyl-driven cholestatic injury.
  • HCG (250-500 IU 2× weekly). Maintains testicular volume / Leydig responsiveness during cycle; eases PCT.

Required (harm-reduction floor; NOT safety)

  • tudca — Tauroursodeoxycholic acid 500-1500 mg/day. Most-cited liver-protection adjunct. Mechanism: improves bile flow, displaces hydrophobic bile acids, reduces cholestatic stress — directly relevant to Superdrol's mechanism of injury (BSEP/MRP2 inhibition). Animal + small human data in cholestatic disease support the mechanism. Does NOT make Superdrol safe. Multiple Superdrol DILI case reports occurred in users running TUDCA. Reduces risk envelope; does not eliminate it.
  • NAC (N-acetylcysteine) 1.2-2.4 g/day. Glutathione precursor; supports phase-II hepatic detoxification. Same caveat as TUDCA — risk-narrowing, not risk-eliminating. Best paired with TUDCA + milk thistle for the harm-reduction floor.
  • Milk thistle (silymarin) 200-600 mg/day. Older harm-reduction standard. Weaker evidence than TUDCA/NAC for Superdrol-specific protection. Doesn't hurt; modest additive benefit.

Avoid stacking with

  • Other 17α-alkylated AAS (oxandrolone, stanozolol, methyltestosterone, oxymetholone (Anadrol), methandienone (Dianabol), fluoxymesterone, danazol). Never stack two oral 17αAAs. Acute hepatic failure cluster. Superdrol particularly because of arguably worst-in-class hepatic injury rate — adding a second 17αAA on top of Superdrol is among the most hepatotoxic recreational protocols possible.
  • Alcohol. Dramatically additive hepatic load. Multiple Superdrol DILI case reports involved concurrent alcohol use as accelerator.
  • Acetaminophen / paracetamol at chronic dose. Even therapeutic-dose acetaminophen meaningfully adds to hepatic burden when combined with Superdrol.
  • Statins. Compounding lipid disruption + hepatic load. Superdrol crashes HDL on its own; statins compound the hepatic risk without addressing the underlying cause.
  • Anticoagulants (warfarin, DOACs). AAS class effect — potentiates anticoagulant action and raises bleeding risk.
  • NSAIDs (chronic). Compounding hepatic + renal load. Relevant for combat athletes who use chronic NSAIDs for joint/training pain.
  • High-dose stimulants / DMAA-era preworkouts. Compounding BP/CV strain. The 2008-2012 ER cluster of CV events in young bodybuilders involved Superdrol + DMAA-era preworkout combinations.
  • Aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole) on a Superdrol-only cycle. Mechanically irrelevant (Superdrol doesn't aromatize); over-suppression of E2 from background T conversion crashes joint health, libido, lipids. AIs only make sense if Superdrol is stacked with aromatizable injectable T.

Neutral / safe co-administration

  • The user's existing V4 stack (DHA, Magtein, Citicoline, NAC, PS, Mg Glycinate, Curcumin Phytosome, Rhodiola, L-Theanine, Glycine/L-Tryptophan, D3+K2, Beta-Alanine, Vit C, creatine) — none would directly increase Superdrol risk; some (NAC, curcumin, omega-3) are part of the harm-reduction floor.
  • Modafinil — neutral. No known interaction. Modafinil shares hepatic metabolism — minor additive load.
Drug interactions deep dive
  • CYP450: Methasterone is metabolized via hepatic 6β-hydroxylation (CYP3A4) and Phase II conjugation pathways (which are partially blocked by the doubly-methylated structure). CYP3A4 inducers (rifampicin, carbamazepine, St. John's wort) may reduce levels modestly; CYP3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole, ritonavir, grapefruit) may raise levels. Clinical significance modest at typical doses; not a primary concern given the dominant hepatotoxicity issue.
  • Anticoagulants: Potentiates warfarin and likely DOACs. Monitor INR closely if combined.
  • Insulin / oral diabetic agents: Reduces insulin sensitivity at supraphysiologic dose; may require dose adjustment for diabetics.
  • Cyclosporine / tacrolimus: AAS may raise levels via CYP3A4 effects. Avoid combination given hepatic load.
  • Hepatically cleared drugs at therapeutic dose: Add hepatic load on top of cholestatic baseline. Avoid where possible.
  • Hormonal contraceptives: No clinical interaction at typical dose. Not relevant for the user.
  • Levothyroxine: AAS may alter thyroid binding globulin and free T4 levels modestly. Recheck TSH if both running.
  • Statins: Compounding hepatic + lipid load; avoid.
Pharmacogenomics

Superdrol is one of the few AAS with a known pharmacogenomic susceptibility factor. El Sherrif 2014 (Liver Int, PMID 24190502) explored ATP8B1/ABCB11 polymorphisms in their case series of four bodybuilders with severe Superdrol-induced cholestatic injury. Findings:

  • ATP8B1 variants (mild subclinical PFIC1-spectrum) — patients with mild BSEP-dysfunction baseline develop dramatic cholestatic injury under Superdrol exposure that they would not develop under dianabol or oxymetholone. The 2α-methyl + 17α-methyl combination appears to particularly stress BSEP function.
  • ABCB11 variants (BSEP polymorphism spectrum) — same pattern; subclinical BSEP dysfunction unmasked by Superdrol exposure.

For the user (June 2026 23andMe + bloodwork): ATP8B1 / ABCB11 / ABCC2 variants are not currently part of consumer-grade 23andMe reporting. Even if they were, the answer is "don't run Superdrol." The pharmacogenomic angle reinforces the verdict; it doesn't introduce a hypothetical scenario where the verdict flips.

Other indirect:

  • UGT1A1 variants (Gilbert's syndrome, ~5-10% population) — already-elevated unconjugated bilirubin baseline; Superdrol's cholestatic stress could push into clinically apparent jaundice faster.
  • HLA-B alleles — emerging evidence for AAS DILI susceptibility; not yet specific for methasterone.
  • CYP3A4 ultra-rapid or poor metabolizer variants could shift methasterone clearance modestly; small relative to dose-range variability from UGL product.

For the user: No specific pharmacogenomic switch flips this from SKIP-AT-20 to anything else. The presence of any BSEP/MRP2 susceptibility variant would make Superdrol exposure catastrophic; the absence does not make it safe.

Sourcing deep dive
Path Vendor Cost Reliability Notes
Legitimate US pharmacy N/A Never FDA-approved. No prescriber can write Superdrol/methasterone in the US. Not a compounding pharmacy option.
Historical retail (2005-2007) Anabolic Extreme Superdrol (10 mg caps) $40-60 / 30 caps historically Medium-Low Sold legally at GNC, Vitamin Shoppe, online supplement retailers. Voluntarily withdrawn 2007. Old-stock not a viable 2026 source.
Historical retail (2008-2012) ProMera Health Methyl Masterdrol Variable Medium-Low Rebrand of methasterone post-Anabolic-Extreme withdrawal. Voluntarily withdrawn 2012. Not a 2026 source.
Underground lab (UGL) Various tablet vendors $1-3 / 10 mg tab UGL Low-Medium Counterfeit + mislabeling endemic; substitution with methylstenbolone, dimethazine, M1T, halodrol documented in independent assays.
Post-DASCA "designer prohormone" rebrands Supplement retailers Variable Low Methasterone-analogs (methylstenbolone, dimethazine) sometimes rebranded as "Mass Drol", "M-Sten", "Brutal 4ce". Schedule III under DASCA "substantially similar" clause. Felony possession in US.
International gray-market pharmacy Russia, India, Mexico, Eastern Europe Variable Low Methasterone never had legitimate pharmacy supply chain anywhere — anything sold abroad is also UGL. Import to US is felony controlled-substance importation.
Compounding pharmacy Not available Schedule III post-DASCA 2014; no compounding pathway in US.

For the user, none of these paths are recommended. Schedule III possession is a federal felony post-DASCA 2014. UGL tablets carry counterfeit + dosing + contamination risk on top of the inherent compound risk. International gray-market import is import-illegality. The compound is structurally inappropriate for the user regardless of source — the hepatotoxicity argument is dominant.

Cost estimate (academic only): A 4-week cycle at 20 mg/day = 28 days × 20 mg = ~560 mg total = ~56 tabs of 10 mg = $50-170 UGL. Trivial compared to the cost of a hepatic injury, an athletic commission failure, a felony charge, or a career-ending sanction. The cost-benefit is comically inverted.

Biomarkers to track (deep)

(For documentation only. The user's biomarker plan does not include monitoring during Superdrol use because there is no Superdrol use planned.)

If a hypothetical AAS-using user wanted a defensible monitoring plan for Superdrol specifically:

Baseline (before any cycle):

  • ALT, AST, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, total + direct bilirubin (bilirubin is the CRITICAL biomarker — cholestatic injury pattern means bilirubin rises before ALT/AST in some cases)
  • Lipid panel — HDL-C, LDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides
  • CBC with differential — hemoglobin, hematocrit
  • CMP — creatinine, eGFR, fasting glucose (renal injury documented alongside hepatic)
  • HbA1c
  • Total + free testosterone, LH, FSH, sensitive estradiol, SHBG, prolactin
  • BP — at-home monitoring, 7-day average (Superdrol drives BP elevation)
  • Resting HR
  • hsCRP

On cycle (week 1, week 2, week 4 — more frequent than other AAS given hepatotoxicity profile):

  • ALT, AST, bilirubin (CRITICAL), GGT, alkaline phosphatase — primary safety panel; cholestatic pattern is the worry
  • Lipid panel
  • CBC (hematocrit watch >52%)
  • BP weekly at home
  • Symptom log — cholestasis signals (jaundice, pruritus, dark urine, light stool, RUQ pain, weight loss, fatigue)

Stop signs requiring immediate cessation (more conservative thresholds than other AAS):

  • ALT or AST >3× ULN (more conservative than 5× ULN for other AAS — given Superdrol's hepatic profile)
  • Bilirubin >2× ULN with rising GGT/AlkPhos — CRITICAL stop sign; cholestatic pattern
  • Any jaundice, pruritus without rash, dark urine + light stool, RUQ pain → STOP IMMEDIATELY, ED if jaundice
  • Sustained BP >150/95
  • Hematocrit >55%
  • Mood instability beyond tolerance

Post-cycle (week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12):

  • Continued LFT monitoring weeks 2-8 post-cessation — Superdrol DILI can present or worsen up to 8 weeks AFTER stopping. This is unique among oral AAS.
  • Full baseline panel + LH/FSH for HPG-axis recovery monitoring
  • Lipid panel — should normalize within 12-24 weeks
  • Liver panel — should normalize within 8-16 weeks; if anything fails to normalize by week 16, escalate to hepatology
  • If bilirubin stays elevated post-cessation: hepatology referral, consider liver MRCP / ultrasound to assess for cholestatic injury and rule out structural complications
Controversies / open debates Live debate
  1. The "designer steroid" loophole that allowed 2005-2012 retail sale. The Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004 scheduled named compounds but not yet-unmarketed analogs. Superdrol was technically a research-shelf compound from 1956 (Vida 1969), so when Anabolic Extreme launched it in 2005, it occupied a gray zone — not on the schedule, sold as a "dietary supplement." The DEA had emergency-scheduling authority but exercised it on a case-by-case basis, lagging behind designer-steroid releases. The Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2014 (DASCA, H.R. 4771, Public Law 113-260) explicitly closed this loophole — added methasterone and 27 other designer steroids to Schedule III, plus a "substantially similar" clause to prevent further loophole exploitation. The case-report DILI cluster from 2006-2014 was a key driver. Schwartz 2008's 17-year-old patient hospitalized from over-the-counter Superdrol, the North Carolina public-health cluster (Public Health Reports 2013), and the Singh / Nasr / El Sherrif / Jasiurkowski case reports all contributed to congressional action.

  2. Was Superdrol "the worst" oral AAS for hepatotoxicity? The honest answer is "plausibly yes, on a per-mg basis, among oral AAS that achieved retail distribution." Per-mg comparisons are confounded by user-cohort differences (Superdrol users tended to be young supplement-store buyers, not experienced bodybuilders running hepatic-protective stacks), but the case-report literature is dense, the LiverTox class assignment is Likelihood A, and the El Sherrif 2014 BSEP-susceptibility findings suggest a structural mechanism for the worse-than-class profile. Honest framing: among oral AAS that achieved retail distribution, Superdrol is in the top 3-5 for per-mg hepatotoxicity, alongside oxymetholone and methandrostenolone, and arguably the single worst for cholestatic DILI specifically.

  3. The "safe Superdrol cycle" claim from the supplement era. The 2005-2012 supplement-era marketing claimed 4-week cycles at 10-20 mg/day were "safe with appropriate cycle support." There is no human RCT supporting this claim. Multiple peer-reviewed case reports document severe cholestatic DILI at exactly these doses and cycle lengths. The harm-reduction adjuncts (TUDCA + NAC + milk thistle) narrow the risk envelope but do not eliminate it — multiple Superdrol DILI cases occurred in users on full harm-reduction stacks. The supplement-era marketing was, in retrospect, irresponsible.

  4. Genetic susceptibility (BSEP/MRP2 polymorphisms). El Sherrif 2014 raised a critical question: is severe Superdrol DILI an idiosyncratic reaction in a genetically-susceptible subpopulation, or a population-wide dose-dependent effect? The current best answer is "both" — Superdrol crosses a hepatotoxicity threshold for the general population at supplement-era doses, and the threshold is dramatically lower for users with subclinical BSEP/MRP2 variants. For the user (no consumer-grade testing for these variants in 2026), the practical implication is that absence of evidence ≠ evidence of absence. A user with a subclinical ATP8B1 variant would have no reason to know it before Superdrol exposure, and the first symptom would be hospitalization.

  5. Modern UGL Superdrol — is it actually methasterone? Independent assays of UGL Superdrol products historically show frequent under-dosing, over-dosing, and substitution (sometimes contains methylstenbolone, dimethazine, M1T, or halodrol instead of methasterone). Without third-party HPLC, you don't know what you took. This is a separate harm category on top of the structural pharmacology — and post-DASCA 2014, the legitimate-supply-chain end is gone, making UGL the only access path.

  6. DASCA 2014 as a case study in supplement-industry regulation. The DASCA legislation is one of the cleaner examples of post-marketing harm signals driving federal action. The case-report literature was the public-health evidence base; the North Carolina cluster investigation was the trigger; the bipartisan congressional response (signed by President Obama December 18, 2014) closed the loophole. For users in 2026, Superdrol's regulatory history is also a cautionary tale about "legal supplements" — legality and safety are not synonymous, and gray-zone retail status can persist for years before public-health evidence accumulates and legislation responds.

  7. Long-term cardiovascular risk. Modern AAS-cohort studies (HAARLEM, MDPI IJMS 2025 cardiovascular review) document cumulative cardiomyopathy, LV hypertrophy, accelerated atherosclerosis in chronic AAS users. Superdrol's severe lipid disruption (HDL crash 60-80%) at supplement-era doses suggests per-cycle CV impact is meaningful. Whether a single 4-week Superdrol cycle contributes meaningfully to lifetime CV risk is unresolved; honest framing: per-cycle CV risk is real (HDL crash, BP elevation, lipid disruption); cumulative-career CV risk is well-documented.

Verdict change log
  • 2026-05-10 — Initial verdict: SKIP-AT-20 at HIGH confidence. For a 20yo MMA athlete + business owner with intact HPG axis at peak endogenous testosterone, brain-priority archetype: zero medical indication, hepatotoxicity is the dominant concern and arguably worst-in-class among oral AAS (case-report cluster of severe cholestatic DILI with at least one transplant-evaluation case, LiverTox Likelihood A, BSEP/MRP2 susceptibility model documented), severe lipid + BP impact, WADA + state athletic commission ban makes positive test career-ending, Schedule III legality risk post-DASCA 2014, and UGL counterfeit risk on top of compound risk. The single hardest SKIP among oral AAS for this archetype. Verdict would only flip in counterfactuals (medically diagnosed catabolic-wasting state with both injectable T and oxandrolone contraindicated) that are not on any realistic horizon and would still favor cleaner alternatives.
Open questions / gaps Open
  1. True population-level DILI rate at supplement-era doses (10-20 mg/day, 4 weeks). The case-report literature documents the unlucky subset; the denominator (number of total Superdrol users 2005-2012) is unknown but estimated in the hundreds of thousands based on retailer-channel data. Per-user DILI rate could be 1/1000 or 1/100; the literature cannot resolve this. What is clear: per-mg hepatotoxicity is among the worst of any AAS that achieved retail distribution.

  2. TUDCA + NAC efficacy in Superdrol-specific context. Animal + cholestatic-disease human data support both. No human RCT in Superdrol users specifically. Bodybuilding-culture consensus has converged on the combination as the harm-reduction floor; that consensus is not RCT-supported, and multiple Superdrol DILI cases occurred in users on full harm-reduction stacks.

  3. BSEP/MRP2 susceptibility population size. El Sherrif 2014 raised the genetic-susceptibility hypothesis but the population-level prevalence of subclinical BSEP/MRP2 variants that would unmask under Superdrol exposure is unknown. Subclinical PFIC1-spectrum / BRIC-spectrum carriers may be 1-3% of population; whether all such carriers would develop dramatic Superdrol DILI is undetermined.

  4. Detection windows for tested athletes. Methasterone metabolites have been targeted by WADA labs since the gray-zone era. Detection windows commonly cited at 2-4 months post-discontinuation, with some long-term metabolites detectable longer. The exact ceiling in a real-world high-cardio combat athlete is not well-published. Zero-tolerance for tested athletes — assume detectability for 6 months minimum.

  5. Persistent hypogonadism risk after a single Superdrol cycle. Most users recover HPG function within 12-16 weeks. A small fraction develops persistent secondary hypogonadism. Per-cycle probability of permanent HPG damage is unclear — bodybuilding-forum reports range 1-5%; rigorous data is absent.

  6. Underground-lab assay reliability post-DASCA. Independent third-party assay culture (Janoshik, AnaboLab) has improved over the past decade. Post-DASCA 2014, methasterone-as-such became less common in UGL channels (compared to substitute compounds methylstenbolone, dimethazine), and what is sold as "Superdrol" is more often a methasterone-analog. You don't know what you took without HPLC.

  7. Late-presenting / late-worsening cholestasis after cessation. The pattern of DILI presenting or worsening 4-8 weeks AFTER stopping Superdrol is documented but mechanistically not fully understood. Possibly reflects accumulation of toxic metabolites in hepatocytes that take weeks to clear after exposure ends. Practical implication: monitoring must extend post-cessation, not just on-cycle.

References

Singh V et al. 2009 — A case of bodybuilder with severe cholestatic jaundice (Superdrol)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2009

foundational case report, 28yo bodybuilder, severe cholestatic jaundice after 4 weeks Superdrol

View Study

Schwartz JM et al. 2008 — Methylated steroid Superdrol causing severe cholestatic hepatitis (Am J Med, PMID 18391541)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2008

17yo with cholestatic hepatitis from OTC Superdrol; major driver of public-health concern

View Study

El Sherrif Y, Potts JR, et al. 2013 — Hepatotoxicity from AAS marketed as dietary supplements: contribution from ATP8B1/ABCB11 mutations? (Liver Int)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2013

case series of four bodybuilders with Superdrol-induced severe cholestatic injury; BSEP/MRP2 transporter polymorphism susceptibility

View Study

Nasr J, Ahmad J 2009 — Severe cholestasis and renal failure from Superdrol (methasterone) (Dig Dis Sci)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2009

case report + literature review; cholestatic injury with concurrent acute kidney injury

View Study

Jasiurkowski B et al. 2006 — Cholestatic jaundice and IgA nephropathy induced by OTC muscle building agent superdrol (Am J Gastroenterol)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 2006

earliest peer-reviewed Superdrol DILI case

View Study

Methasterone — LiverTox NCBI Bookshelf NBK548194

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

dedicated LiverTox entry on methasterone hepatotoxicity; Likelihood A; cholestatic injury pattern

View Source

Anabolic Steroids — LiverTox NCBI Bookshelf NBK548931

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

class entry on AAS hepatotoxicity; methasterone listed among most hepatotoxic

View Source

Designer Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2014 (DASCA) — H.R. 4771, Public Law 113-260

congress.gov · 2014

explicit federal scheduling of methasterone and 27 other designer steroids; closed the post-2004 gray-zone loophole

View Source

Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004 — Public Law 108-358

congress.gov · 2004

precursor 2004 Act with DEA emergency-scheduling authority

View Source

DEA Final Rule — Schedule III placement of designer steroids (2014, post-DASCA)

deadiversion.usdoj.gov · 2014

DEA enforcement action

View Source

Latest research

How was your experience with this compound?

Anonymous · one vote per session · results below at 5+ votes.

Loading…

See something off?

Most of this wiki is AI-generated. Suggest a correction, dosing update, or new evidence — we review every submission.

Discussion — click to load
Loading…